Search Results

The IBL C3d-CIC test is a semi-quantitative enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro diagnostic detection of circulating immune complex that bind C3d in human serum. The measurement is performed as an aid in the diagnosis of various autoimmune and other CIC related diseases. Levels of these complexes are one indicator in a multi-factorial diagnostic regime.

semi-quantitative enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro diagnostic detection of circulating immune complex that bind C3d in human serum.

I apologize, but the provided text from the FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the "IBL C3d-CIC EIA Test" does not contain the detailed information required to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them.

The letter primarily covers:

• The FDA's determination of substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
• Regulatory classifications and requirements.
• Contact information for various FDA offices.
• The "Indications For Use" statement for the device.

It explicitly states that the device is "substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices." This means the FDA's decision is based on a comparison to an existing device, rather than a detailed presentation of a new study demonstrating performance against specific acceptance criteria within this document. Such study details are typically found in the full 510(k) submission, which is not provided here.

Therefore, I cannot extract the following information from the given text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This document does not specify any quantitative acceptance criteria or performance metrics for the IBL C3d-CIC EIA Test itself.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not mentioned.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications: Not mentioned.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not mentioned.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable, as this is an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) test, not an AI-assisted diagnostic imaging device for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable, this is an IVD kit, not an algorithm. Its performance is its standalone performance.
7. The type of ground truth used: Not mentioned.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not mentioned.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not mentioned.

The "Indications For Use" section provides context for the device's purpose:

• Device Name: IBL C3d-CIC EIA Test
• Indications For Use: A semi-quantitative enzyme immunoassay for the in vitro diagnostic detection of circulating immune complex that bind C3d in human serum. The measurement is performed as an aid in the diagnosis of various autoimmune and other CIC related diseases. Levels of these complexes are one indicator in a multi-factorial diagnostic regime.

To get the information you're looking for, one would need access to the full 510(k) submission document (Premarket Notification) itself, which contains the detailed scientific and clinical data submitted to the FDA.

Ask a specific question about this device