Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K151969
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2016-01-19

    (187 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5440
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Hospira Extension Sets

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Hospira Extension sets are indicated for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system.

    Device Description

    The Hospira Extension Sets are intended for use as gravity sets. Hospira Extension sets are comprised of various components including the following: male luer adapter with cap, tubing, female luer adapter, flow control device, in-line adapter, injection site assembly, and Dial-A-Flo. Extension sets are configured to ensure the intended use of the device is met. Hospira Extension sets are intended for the delivery of fluids from a container to a patient's vascular system. The sets are disposable devices for single patient use.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for Hospira Extension Sets, which are intravascular administration sets. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily due to changes in tubing material and a needleless valve component.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria, based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are primarily derived from international standards for medical devices, specifically those relating to biocompatibility and mechanical/functional performance of IV administration sets. The reported device performance indicates that the new Hospira Extension Sets meet these standards.

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard & Section)Reported Device Performance
    Biocompatibility:
    ISO 10993-4 HemocompatibilityAcceptable
    ISO 10993-5 CytotoxicityAcceptable
    ISO 10993-10 SensitizationAcceptable
    ISO 10993-11 Intracutaneous ReactivityAcceptable
    Systemic ToxicityAcceptable
    Acute ToxicityAcceptable
    Subchronic ToxicityAcceptable
    PyrogenicityAcceptable
    Mechanical/Functional Performance:
    ISO 594-1 (Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper for syringes, needles, and certain other medical equipment):
    4.1 GaugingAcceptable
    4.2 Liquid LeakageAcceptable
    4.3 Air LeakageAcceptable
    4.4 Separation ForceAcceptable
    4.5 Stress CrackingAcceptable
    ISO 594-2 (Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper - Part 2: Lock fittings):
    4.1 GaugingAcceptable
    4.2 Liquid LeakageAcceptable
    4.3 Separation ForceAcceptable
    4.4 Unscrewing TorqueAcceptable
    4.5 Ease of AssemblyAcceptable
    4.6 Resistance to OverridingAcceptable
    4.7 Stress CrackingAcceptable
    ISO 8536-4 (Infusion equipment for medical use - Part 4: Infusion sets for single use, gravity feed):
    6.1 Particulate ContaminationAcceptable
    6.2 LeakageAcceptable
    6.3 Tensile StrengthAcceptable
    6.6 TubingAcceptable
    6.7 Fluid FilterAcceptable
    6.9 Flow RegulatorAcceptable
    6.10 Flow RateAcceptable
    6.11 Injection SiteAcceptable
    6.12 Male Conical FittingAcceptable
    6.13 Protective CapsAcceptable
    Sterilization:
    Sterility Assurance Level (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1 and 11737-1)10^-6

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and the Data Provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for each specific test mentioned (e.g., number of devices tested for liquid leakage, number of samples for cytotoxicity). It broadly states that "new data has been generated" and "all testing is acceptable."

    The data provenance is not specified in terms of country of origin. The studies are non-clinical (laboratory testing) rather than studies on human subjects, so the retrospective or prospective nature isn't directly applicable in the same way it would be for clinical trials. The focus is on demonstrating compliance with recognized international standards for device performance and safety.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not applicable and not provided in the document. The "ground truth" for non-clinical performance and biocompatibility testing is established by the specified standards (ISO 10993, ISO 594-1, ISO 594-2, ISO 8536-4), rather than expert consensus on interpretive data. The tests themselves are objective measurements against defined parameters.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in studies involving subjective assessment (e.g., image interpretation by multiple readers). For objective bench testing against defined standards, the outcome is determined by whether the device's performance falls within the specified acceptance limits for each test.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance

    No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This type of study is not relevant for the evaluation of an invasive medical device like an extension set, which does not involve human interpretation of diagnostic data or AI assistance in a clinical workflow.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    No standalone algorithm performance study was done. This device is not an AI/ML-based diagnostic or therapeutic algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (Expert Consensus, Pathology, Outcomes Data, etc.)

    The "ground truth" for the device's performance is defined by adherence to objective, quantitative and qualitative criteria set forth in recognized international standards (ISO 10993, ISO 594-1, ISO 594-2, ISO 8536-4, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11737-1). For example, for "liquid leakage," the ground truth is whether the device leaks or not under specified test conditions, as defined by the ISO standard. For "cytotoxicity," it's whether the materials cause a cytotoxic reaction above a defined threshold.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable. The development of this medical device (Hospira Extension Sets) does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI. The design and validation are based on engineering principles, materials science, and compliance with established performance standards.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1