Search Results

The Hans Rudolph 7500 Series Reusable Oro-Nasal NIV Masks are intended to provide a patient interface for application of noninvasive ventilation. The mask is to be used as an accessory to ventilators which have adequate alarms and safety systems for ventilator failure, and which are intended to administer positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure or respiratory insufficiency. The mask is multi-patient reusable. It is intended for use on adult patients above 30 kilograms weight, who are appropriate candidates for noninvasive ventilation, in the home, hospital, or other clinical setting.

Not Found

The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Hans Rudolph 7500 Series Reusable Oro-Nasal NIV Masks does not contain the information requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria.

This document is a clearance letter, which means the FDA has determined that the device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This determination is based on a review of the company's 510(k) submission, which would have included information comparing the new device to the predicate device. However, the clearance letter itself only states the outcome of that review and the indications for use.

Therefore, I cannot provide the specific details you've requested. Here's why and what's typically missing:

1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: This letter summarizes the regulatory decision, not the performance data itself.
2. Sample Size and Data Provenance: This information would be in the detailed submission, not the clearance letter.
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications: This applies to studies, which are not detailed here.
4. Adjudication Method: Again, this is study-specific information.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study: This is a type of study often done for AI/CAD devices, but not relevant for a physical medical device like a mask, and certainly not detailed in this clearance letter.
6. Standalone Performance: This device is a physical mask for ventilation, not an algorithm.
7. Type of Ground Truth: This refers to the reference standard in a diagnostic study, which is not applicable here.
8. Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable for this type of device or documentation.
9. Ground Truth for Training Set: Not applicable for this type of device or documentation.

To obtain the kind of detailed information you're asking for, you would typically need to review the full 510(k) submission, which is significantly more extensive than the clearance letter. These submissions often include detailed test reports, performance data, and comparisons to predicate devices.

Ask a specific question about this device