Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K062935
    Date Cleared
    2006-10-13

    (15 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4400
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    HABIB 4X LAPAROSCOPIC

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Habib 4X Laparoscopic is intended to be used to assist in coagulation of tissue during intraoperative and laparoscopic surgical procedures

    Device Description

    The Habib 4X Laparoscopic is a bipolar radiofrequency (RF) device that consists of a handle, an instrument shaft, and an array of four needles at the distal end of the instrument. The instrument has an attached cable which connects the device directly to the RITA Medical 1500X RF generator. The device electrodes are inserted into tissue is coagulated using the RF power. The Habib 4X Laparoscopic is designed for use in laparoscopic surgery and the instrument shaft fits through a standard 10mm laparoscopic port. The handle includes an RF on/off switch which can be operated with either the left or right hand. The Habib 4X Laparoscopic is a single use device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does NOT contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, or a detailed study proving the device meets specific criteria. It is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Habib 4X Laparoscopic) seeking substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices.

    The document states:

    • "Performance testing was done to ensure that the Habib 4 X Laparoscopic functions as intended and meets design specifications. Sufficient data was obtained to show that the device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device, and meets safety and effectiveness criteria."

    However, it does not provide:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    • Details on sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, or expert qualifications for any specific study.
    • Information about MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, or training set details.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request for a table of acceptance criteria and study details based on the provided text. The document focuses on establishing substantial equivalence based on technological characteristics and intended use compared to predicate devices, rather than presenting a detailed performance study with specific quantitative acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1