Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K221898
    Date Cleared
    2022-07-28

    (28 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5980
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Gastrointestinal Boundary Identifier (GIBI HD)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The GIBI HD™ is indicated for use in gastric and bariatric surgical procedures to decompress the stomach, drain and remove gastric fluid, irrigate, and act as a sizing guide.

    Device Description

    The Gastrointestinal Boundary Identifier, or GIBI HD™, is a flexible gastric tube designed to be used in gastric and bariatric surgical procedures. The catheter provides visible and tactile delineation of the antrum of the stomach along with the ability to decompress the stomach, drain and remove gastric fluid and size a gastric pouch.

    The dual lumen GIBI HD utilizes one lumen for drainage, suction and irrigation and the second lumen to inflate/deflate the balloon. The catheter is attached to a 32-inch suction tubing and a 6inch tubing with a stopcock for filling the balloon.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the Gastrointestinal Boundary Identifier (GIBI HD™). It describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to a predicate device, including performance data from bench tests.

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for the Gastrointestinal Boundary Identifier (GIBI HD™)

    The document primarily focuses on bench testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence, rather than clinical studies involving human patients or complex AI algorithms. Therefore, many of the typical questions regarding AI-driven medical devices (like MRMC studies, ground truth establishment for complex imaging, training set details, or expert adjudication) are not applicable to this submission.

    Here's a breakdown of the available information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Test PerformedPurposeAcceptance CriteriaResults
    Balloon leakage testThe balloon component of the GIBI HD shall inflate to a minimum volume of 100 cc without exhibiting fluid leak or air egress.Samples retained 100 cc of fluid at least 1 minute without leakage.Pass
    Fluid removal testThe GIBI HD shall remove a minimum of 500 cc of saline or clean water in under 1 minute.Samples evacuated a minimum of 500 cc of fluid in under 1 minute.Pass
    Balloon bond joint strength testThe mated joint between the GIBI HD 's Balloon and Tubing shall withstand a minimum of 13 lbf prior to separation.Samples did not exhibit balloon separation under 13 lbf.Pass
    Distal tip bond joint strength testThe mated joint between the GIBI HD 's distal tip and Tubing shall withstand a minimum of 19.5 lbf prior to separation.Samples did not exhibit sensor tip separation under 19.5 lbf.Pass
    Stopcock separation testThe stopcock component of the GIBI HD shall withstand a minimum of 1 lbf prior to separation from the fill tube.Samples did not exhibit stopcock separation under 1 lbf.Pass
    Fill tube separation testThe fill tube attached to the stopcock of the GIBI HD shall withstand a minimum of 1 lbf prior to separation from the y connector.Samples did not exhibit fill tube separation under 1 lbf.Pass
    Adapter tubing separation testThe proximal tubing of the GIBI HD shall withstand a minimum of 1 lbf prior to separation from the y connector.Samples did not exhibit adapter tube separation under 1 lbf.Pass
    Adapter separation testThe adapter of the GIBI HD shall withstand a minimum of 1 lbf prior to separation from the adapter tube.Samples did not exhibit adapter separation under 1 lbf.Pass
    Visual Inspection and Measurement verification test (Length)The dual lumen catheter component of the GIBI HD, from the distal edge of the Y connector to the end of the dual lumen catheter, shall have a minimum length of 75 cm.Minimum length of measured sample is 75 cm.Pass
    Visual Inspection and Measurement verification test (Indicator Marks)The dual lumen catheter component of the GIBI HD shall include indication marks on the surface of the tube at 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 cm with respect to the distal portion of the component.Indicator marks are located 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 cm with respect to distal portion of the component.Pass
    Visual Inspection and Measurement verification test (Outer Diameter)The dual lumen catheter component of the GIBI HD shall have three size configurations: 0.42" (32 Fr), 0.47" (36 Fr) and 0.53" (40 Fr).Outer diameter of 32Fr, 36Fr and 40Fr samples are 0.42", 0.47" and 0.53", respectively.Pass

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document states "Samples" for the performance tests, but does not specify the exact sample size (N) used for each test. The tests are bench tests, meaning they were performed in a lab setting, not on patient data. Therefore, the concept of "country of origin of the data" or "retrospective/prospective" study design in the context of clinical data does not apply here. The data provenance is from in-house bench testing.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. The ground truth for this device is based on engineering specifications and measurable physical properties (e.g., fluid retention volume, force required for separation, length, diameter, and presence of markings) as evaluated during bench testing. This does not involve expert interpretation of medical images or clinical outcomes.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. As the tests are physical measurements and functional evaluations, there is no need for expert adjudication in the classic sense. The "ground truth" is determined by the Pass/Fail criteria directly from the physical testing.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is a mechanical surgical instrument, not an AI-driven diagnostic or interpretative tool. No MRMC study was conducted or is relevant for this type of device.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or software device.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for these performance tests is defined by the engineering specifications and physical requirements for the device's components and functionality. This is a technical ground truth based on measurable physical properties rather than clinical outcomes, pathology, or expert consensus on medical images.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This is a manufactured physical good, not an AI model requiring a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. As this device does not involve a training set for an AI model, this question is not relevant.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1