Search Results

The Greatbatch Scientific MR Compatible Hysteroscope is used to permit direct viewing of the cervical canal and the uterine cavity for the purpose of performing diagnostic and surgical procedures.

The Greatbatch Scientific MR Compatible Hysteroscopes are available in standard and autoclavable 2.0mm and 4.0mm outer diameters with 0° and 30° viewing angles.

The provided text describes the 510(k) summary and FDA clearance letter for the Greatbatch Scientific MR Compatible Hysteroscope. It states that the device was tested for MR compatibility. However, the document does not provide detailed information about the acceptance criteria or the specific study details for proving the device meets those criteria. The information below is limited to what can be extracted from the provided text.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document does not specify the sample size or data provenance for the MR compatibility testing.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

Not applicable. The testing was for MR compatibility, which typically involves physical measurements rather than expert interpretation of data.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable. This is not a study involving human interpretation of results.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This device is a medical instrument, not an AI software, and the testing was for MR compatibility, not for diagnostic accuracy that would involve human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is a medical instrument, not an AI algorithm. The testing was for the inherent MR compatibility of the device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The ground truth for MR compatibility would be established by specific performance standards and physical measurements as defined by applicable medical device standards for MR safety (e.g., ASTM standards for MR compatibility). The document does not explicitly state the specific standards or measurements used.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.

Ask a specific question about this device