Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K181931
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2019-04-04

    (260 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The GMC Upper Arm Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor, Model X3, is a non-invasive blood pressure measurement device that is used for measuring systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate using the oscillometric method for adults at home.

    The device has an irregular heartbeat (IHB) indicator. The device detects the appearance of an irregular heartbeat during measurement, and displays an IHB symbol on the LCD with the reading once the irregular heartbeat is detected.

    Device Description

    The GMC Upper Arm Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor, Model X3, measures systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate of an adult individual. The method used to define blood pressure is similar to the auscultatory method but uses an electronic pressure sensor rather than a stethoscope and mercury manometer. The device utilizes the oscillometric method whereby the electronic pressure sensor converts variation in cuff pressure to electrical signals. The electrical signals are analyzed and used to define the systolic and diastolic measurements and determine the pulse rate. An irregular heart beat (IHB) indicator is displayed when there is more than a 25% deviation from the averaged pulse rate measurements.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study proving the device meets them, based on the provided document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard / Requirement)Reported Device Performance (GMC X3)
    Accuracy (Pressure)± 3 mmHg
    Accuracy (Pulse)± 5% of reading
    ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1 (Basic safety & essential performance)Meets all applicable requirements
    IEC 60601-1-2 (Electromagnetic disturbances)Meets all applicable requirements
    IEC 60601-1-11 (Home healthcare environment)Meets all applicable requirements
    IEC 80601-2-30 (Automated non-invasive sphygmomanometers)Meets all applicable requirements
    ISO 10993-1 (Biocompatibility)Materials are widely used in similar applications; evaluated accordingly.
    ISO 81060-2 (Clinical validation of automated measurement type)Clinical accuracy tested and documented in Clinical Investigation Report.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

    • Sample Size for Test Set: 85 patients (39 males and 46 females).
    • Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin or whether the study was retrospective or prospective. However, clinical validation studies for a new device are typically prospective.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts:

    • The document implies that the ground truth for blood pressure measurements was established using the standard auscultation method. It does not specify the number of experts (e.g., clinicians, physicians) performing the auscultation, nor their specific qualifications (e.g., "radiologist with 10 years of experience"). It's standard practice for trained medical professionals to perform auscultation, but their specific experience level is not detailed here.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

    • The document states: "Blood pressure measurements were repeated alternatively with the device and auscultation in the same arm according to the sequence in #3-122 ISO 81060-2 Second edition 2013-05-01 Non-invasive sphygmomanometers - Part 2: Clinical validation of automated measurement type."
    • This suggests a direct comparison method between the device and the auscultation reference. The specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) is not detailed. However, ISO 81060-2 has specific requirements for the number of observers and how their readings are handled to establish criteria for ground truth.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not performed for this device. This is a blood pressure monitor, not an AI-powered diagnostic imaging device that would involve human readers interpreting cases. The study focuses on the accuracy of the automated measurement against a reference method.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Yes, the clinical testing described is primarily a standalone performance evaluation of the device's algorithm. The "GMC Upper Arm Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor, Model X3" is an automated device, meaning its algorithm determines the blood pressure readings without direct human interpretation of a raw signal, other than possibly initiating the measurement. The clinical study validates the accuracy of these automated readings against a standard reference.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

    • The ground truth used was expert auscultation measurements. The document states, "Standard auscultation method was used as the reference blood pressure monitor measuring in the left arm." Auscultation by a trained professional is considered a clinical gold standard for blood pressure measurement in this context.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

    • The document does not provide information regarding a training set. This is typical for a device like a blood pressure monitor, which relies on established oscillometric principles and calibration, rather than a machine learning model that requires a distinct training phase.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:

    • As no training set is mentioned or implied, the document does not provide information on how ground truth for a training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1