LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K051449
    Device Name
    GE VIVID 7 WITH OR WITHOUT SUFFIX
    Manufacturer
    GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS
    Date Cleared
    2005-06-16

    (14 days)

    Product Code
    IYN,ITX,IYO
    Regulation Number
    892.1550
    Type
    Special
    Panel
    Radiology (RA)
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K003931,K041552
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    GE VIVID 7 WITH OR WITHOUT SUFFIX

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows: Fetal / Obstetrics, Abdominal (including Renal and GYN/Pelvic), Pediatric, Small Organ (including breast, testes, thyroid), Neonatal Cephalic, Adult Cephalic, Cardiac (adult and pediatric), Peripheral Vascular, Musculo-skeletal Conventional, Other (including Urology/Prostate), Transesophageal, Transrectal, Transvaginal, and Intraoperative (abdominal, thoracic, & vascular).

    Device Description

    The GE Vivid 7 Diagnostic Ultrasound is a full featured echocardiography imaging and analysis system. It consists of a mobile cart or a large console with Service, 96 cm deep and 139 cm deep and 139 cm and analysis system. The user interface includes and high that provides digital acquisition, processing and display. This modification will provide users with for improved performance and productivity.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the GE Vivid 7 Diagnostic Ultrasound System with EchoPAC BT05. This submission focuses on comparing the new device to a predicate device and demonstrating substantial equivalence, rather than establishing new performance criteria or efficacy beyond what is already accepted for diagnostic ultrasound systems.

    Thus, the document explicitly states: "Clinical Tests: None required." This means no specific acceptance criteria or dedicated study proving the device meets those criteria were conducted beyond non-clinical tests. The submission relies on the existing substantial equivalence to predicate devices and established safety standards for diagnostic ultrasound.

    Therefore, many of the requested details about acceptance criteria and clinical study design cannot be extracted from this document, as such a study was not deemed necessary for this type of submission.

    Here's a breakdown of what can be inferred or explicitly stated based on the provided text, and where information is not available:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Safety and EffectivenessThe device's "key safety and effectiveness information" is comparable and substantially equivalent to the currently marketed GE Vivid 7, which is already in commercial distribution and deemed safe and effective.
    Predicate Device EquivalenceThe GE Vivid 7 BT05 is described as "of a comparable type and substantially equivalent to the current GE Vivid 7." It has the "same basic intended use and overali characteristics, key safety and effectiveness information and operating modes as the predicate device." This includes enhanced measurement capability, upgraded beamformer, and improved patient exam reporting.
    Compliance with Non-Clinical Standards"The device has been evaluated for acoustic output, biocompatibility, cleaning and disinfection effectiveness, electromagnetic compatibility, as well as thermal, electrical and mechanical safety standards." The manufacturer conforms with 21 CFR 820, ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 13485 quality systems.
    Intended Uses consistency with traditional clinical practiceThe "Intended uses and other key features are consistent with traditional clinical practice, FDA guidance documents and development process of the development process of the device manufacturer..."
    Specific Performance MetricsNot applicable/Not provided. This is a 510(k) for an incremental update (BT05) to an existing device (GE Vivid 7), demonstrating equivalence, not establishing new performance benchmarks.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance

    • Sample Size: Not applicable. No clinical test set was used, as clinical tests were "None required."
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    • Not applicable. No clinical test set was used.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    • Not applicable. No clinical test set was used.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The document states "Clinical Tests: None required."

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. The device is a diagnostic ultrasound system, not an AI-only algorithm. No standalone performance study was conducted or required.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    • Not applicable. No specific ground truth was established for "clinical tests" as they were not required. The "ground truth" for this 510(k) submission is the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate GE Vivid 7 device.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This is not a submission for an AI/ML algorithm that would undergo a training phase.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1