Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K972774
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1999-05-05

    (650 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Gas Plasma Sterilization is intended to be used for terminal sterilization of all Zimmer Ultra-High Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) products as follows:

    • Trilogy® Acctabular System (acctabular liners) .
    • t Nex Gento Complete Knee Solution (articular surfaces and patellas)
    Device Description

    Sterrad 100 Sterilization System

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document describes the summary of safety and effectiveness for "Gas Plasma Sterilization" for Zimmer Ultra-High Molecular-Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) products.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Achievement of a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ (implied by typical sterilization standards)A sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ was achieved. (Stated as "a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶")

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set of the sterilization validation. It broadly mentions "Performance Testing/Sterilization Validation." It also does not specify the provenance of the data (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective). Sterilization validations typically involve controlled laboratory experiments rather than patient data.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    The document does not mention the use of experts or the establishment of "ground truth" in the context of a test set for this sterilization validation. Sterilization validations typically rely on established microbiological testing methods rather than expert consensus on subjective interpretations.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. Adjudication methods (like 2+1, 3+1) are usually relevant for studies involving human interpretation or subjective assessment, which is not the case for a sterilization validation.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No. An MRMC comparative effectiveness study is not applicable as this is a sterilization validation, not a study evaluating human readers' performance with or without AI assistance.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

    Yes, in principle. A sterilization validation is inherently a standalone performance assessment of the sterilization process itself, without human intervention in the sterilization efficacy. The "device" in this context is the sterilization process.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for a sterilization validation is based on microbiological testing, specifically demonstrating the inactivation of a predefined number of highly resistant microorganisms (biological indicators) to achieve the specified Sterility Assurance Level (SAL). This is an objective, quantitative measure.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The concept of a "training set" is not applicable to a sterilization validation. Sterilization validations are based on established scientific principles and experimental protocols, not machine learning models that require training data.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as there is no training set for a sterilization validation.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1