Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K231101
    Device Name
    Flume Catheter
    Date Cleared
    2023-06-29

    (72 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Flume Catheter

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The FLUME catheter is intended for bladder drainage via urethral or suprapubic route.

    Device Description

    The FLUME catheter is intended for the drainage of urine from the bladder. The FLUME catheter is a sterile indwelling urinary catheter intended for single use. The FLUME catheter is made using polyurethanebased polymers. The catheter has an inflatable retention balloon attached to the catheter shaft. The catheter has a dual lumen tube. The larger lumen is for urine drainage. The smaller lumen is used to inflate and deflate the balloon with sterile water. The distal end has two opposite eye holes, which are used for drainage. The product is available in standard sizes. The catheter may be placed following the institutions' standard practice for either urethral bladder drainage or via percutaneous suprapubic access to the bladder.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the FLUME catheter, which seeks to expand its indications for use to include suprapubic drainage. This is a special 510(k) submission, meaning it relies heavily on the predicate device (FLUME catheter K212151) as the current device has no changes in design, materials, or manufacturing processes.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed performance metrics against specific criteria for the expanded indication of suprapubic use. Instead, it relies on the predicate device's established performance and extensive non-clinical testing.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Safety (Biocompatibility):
    The device should not cause adverse biological reactions when in contact with the body.Biocompatibility testing from the predicate device (FLUME catheter K212151) was leveraged.
    The performed tests include:
    • Cytotoxicity
    • Sensitization
    • Irritation
    • Acute Systemic Toxicity
    • Subacute Systemic Toxicity
    • Material Mediated Pyrogenicity
    • Subcutaneous Implantation
    • Genotoxicity
    All tests align with ISO 10993-1.
    Conclusion: Biocompatibility evaluation expectations for suprapubic use are met.
    Pyrogenicity:
    The device should be free of pyrogens to prevent fever.Bacterial Endotoxin Testing (BET) was conducted and confirmed the device meets pyrogen limit specifications.
    Functional Equivalence:
    The FLUME catheter, when used for suprapubic drainage, should function equivalently to its previously cleared urethral use and to the predicate device.The submission states: "There are no changes or differences made to the FLUME catheter to extend the indication for use to include suprapubic drainage. The only change in this Special 510(k) is to the current indication for use and instructions for use." And "According to the risk assessment, there is no difference to the patient when the FLUME catheter is placed suprapubic." This implies that the existing performance (drainage, retention, material integrity) is considered adequate for the new route of administration due to the lack of device changes.
    The device maintains the following features of the predicate:
    • Sterile indwelling urinary catheter for single use.
    • Made of polyurethane-based polymers.
    • Inflatable retention balloon.
    • Dual lumen (larger for urine drainage, smaller for balloon inflation/deflation).
    • Two opposite eye holes for drainage.
    • Available in standard sizes.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not describe a new "test set" in the traditional sense of a clinical or ex-vivo study with a defined sample size for the expanded indication.

    • Sample Size: Not applicable/not provided for a specific test set related to the suprapubic indication as it's a Special 510(k) leveraging prior data.
    • Data Provenance: The biocompatibility data is "leveraged from the predicate device." This suggests the data was generated previously for the predicate device, but its original provenance (e.g., country, retrospective/prospective) is not detailed in this summary.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. This is not a study involving expert-established ground truth for a test set. The submission relies on non-clinical data and risk assessment.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. There is no described test set requiring adjudication in this summary.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No. The document explicitly states "SUMMARY of NON-CLINICAL TESTING." There is no mention of an MRMC comparative effectiveness study.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    Not applicable. This device is a physical urological catheter, not an algorithm or AI-based device.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the safety aspects (biocompatibility, pyrogenicity) is based on standardized testing protocols (e.g., ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility, bacterial endotoxin testing for pyrogenicity) and internal risk assessments concluding equivalence. For functional equivalence, the ground truth is the established performance of the predicate device.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K212151
    Device Name
    FLUME catheter
    Date Cleared
    2021-11-03

    (117 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    FLUME catheter

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The FLUME catheter is intended for the drainage of the urinary tract.

    Device Description

    The FLUME catheter is a sterile indwelling urinary catheter intended for single use. The FLUME catheter is made using polyurethane-based polymers. The catheter has an inflatable retention balloon attached to the catheter has a dual lumen tube. The larger lumen is for draining urine from the urinary tract. The smaller lumen is used to inflate and deflate the balloon with sterile water. The distal end has two opposite eye holes, which are used for drainage. The product is available in size 14 Fr with a smooth shaft.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the FLUME catheter, which is a urological catheter. It discusses the device's indications for use, its comparison to a predicate device (Teleflex Rusch All-Silicone Foley Catheter K980870), and the non-clinical testing performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

    However, the document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria for an AI/ML-driven medical device. Specifically, there is no mention of:

    • AI/ML performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC)
    • Sample sizes for test or training sets for an AI model
    • Data provenance for AI/ML data
    • Expert ground truth establishment for AI/ML models
    • Adjudication methods for AI/ML ground truth
    • Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies
    • Standalone AI algorithm performance
    • Types of ground truth for AI/ML (e.g., pathology, outcomes data)
    • How ground truth for a training set was established for an AI model

    The FLUME catheter is a physical medical device, and the testing described (Biocompatibility, Sterilization Validation, Transportation simulation/package integrity/shelf-life, and Performance/Functional testing per ASTM F623-19) are standard non-clinical tests for such devices to demonstrate physical and biological safety and performance, not AI/ML algorithm performance.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information based on the provided input. The document does not describe a study involving an AI/ML component.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1