Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(86 days)
Fluid Resistant Procedure Mask, Fluid Resistant Surgical Mask
The Fluid Resistant Procedure/Surgical Masks are intended to be worn to protect both the patient and healthcare personnel from transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. These face masks are intection control practices to reduce the potential exposure to blood and body fluids. This a single use, disposable device(s), provided non-sterile.
The proposed device (model: 15603F) is blue color, and Flat Pleated type mask, utilizing Ear Loops way for wearing, and it has Nose clips design for fitting the face mask around the nose.
The proposed device (model: 15703F) is blue color, and Flat Pleated type mask, utilizing tie-on way for wearing, and it has Nose clips design for fitting the face mask around the nose.
The proposed devices are manufactured with three layers, the inner and outer layers are made of Non-woven Fabric(polypropylene), and the middle layer is made of Melton brown Fabric (Polypropylene). The 15603F model of proposed device, ear loops, is held in place over the users' mouth and nose by two elastic ear loops welded to the face mask. The elastic ear loops are made of polyurethane. The nose piece contained in the proposed device(s) is in the layers of face mask to allow the user to fit the face mask around their nose, which is made of Polypropylene coating iron. The 15703F model of proposed device, tie-on, is held in place over the users' mouth and nose by two tie-on bands welded to the face mask. The tie-on bands are made of non-woven Fabric (Polypropylene). The nose piece contained in the proposed device(s) is in the layers of face mask to allow the user to fit the face mask around their nose, which is made of Polypropylene coating iron. The proposed devices are sold non-sterile and are intended to be single use, disposable device.
This appears to be a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Fluid Resistant Procedure/Surgical Mask), which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than a comprehensive comparative effectiveness study with human readers or clinical outcomes. Therefore, many of the requested points related to AI/human reader studies, expert ground truth, and training data will not be applicable.
However, based on the provided document, here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Item | Acceptance Criteria | Proposed Device (Model: 15603F) Performance | Proposed Device (Model: 15703F) Performance | Result (for both models) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluid Resistance (ASTM F1862) | 29 out of 32 pass at 120 mmHg for level 2 | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. 32 out of 32 pass at 120 mmHg. | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. 32 out of 32 pass at 120 mmHg. | PASS |
| Particulate Filtration Efficiency (ASTM F2299) | ≥ 98% | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. Lot1: 99.15%, Lot2: 99.22%, Lot3: 99.22%. | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. Lot1: 99.03%, Lot2: 99.10%, Lot3: 99.30%. | PASS |
| Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (ASTM F2101) | ≥ 98% | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. Lot1: 99.40%, Lot2: 99.50%, Lot3: 99.60%. | 3 non-consecutive lots tested, using a sample size of 32/lot. Lot1: 99.20%, Lot2: 99.30%, Lot3: 99.30%. | PASS |
| Differential Pressure (Delta P) (EN 14683 Annex C) |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1