Search Results

EG-530N is intended for the visualization of the upper digestive tract, specifically for the observation, diagnosis, and endoscopic treatment of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenal bulb. The EG-530N can be inserted orally or transnasally.

FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EG-530N is comprised of three general sections: a control portion, an insertion portion and an umbilicus. The control portion controls the angulation of the endoscope. This portion also controls the flexibility of the distal end in the endoscope. The insertion portion contains glass fiber bundles, several channels and a complementary Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) image sensor in its distal end. The channels in the insertion portion assist in delivering air/suction as well as endoscope accessories, such as forceps. The glass fiber bundles allow light to travel through the endoscope and emit light from the tip of the insertion to illuminate the body cavity. This provides enough light to the CCD image sensor to capture an image and display it on the monitor. The umbilicus consists of electronic components needed to operate the endoscope when plugged in to the video processor and the light source. The endoscope is used in combination with FUJIFILM's video processors, light sources and peripheral devices such as monitor, printer, foot switch, and cart.

This document describes the FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EG-530N. However, the provided text does not contain information about a study proving that the device meets acceptance criteria related to an AI or algorithm's performance. The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical endoscope, focusing on its mechanical and electrical safety, biocompatibility, reprocessing validation, and basic performance characteristics (field of view, bending capability, etc.).

It does not mention:

• Any AI component or algorithm.
• Software performance criteria based on diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or similar metrics typically associated with AI.
• Studies involving human readers with or without AI assistance (MRMC studies).
• Any ground truth establishment by experts for diagnostic purposes.
• Training or test set sample sizes for an algorithm.

The "Performance Data" section refers to engineering and safety tests for the endoscope itself, not an AI or diagnostic algorithm.

Therefore, based on the provided text, I cannot answer the specific questions about acceptance criteria for an AI-driven device, the study proving it, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training sets, or ground truth establishment relevant to AI.

The acceptance criteria mentioned in the document are for the physical endoscope's performance, such as:

• Field of view
• Bending capability
• Rate of air supply
• Rate of water supply
• Suction rate
• Working length
• Forceps channel diameter
• Viewing direction
• Resolution
• LG output (presumably "Light Guide output" or similar)

The document states: "In all cases, the devices met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for the test." However, it does not provide the specific numerical acceptance criteria or the detailed results for each of these physical parameters.

In summary, your request seems to be looking for information about an AI/algorithm-driven device, but the provided documentation is for a traditional medical endoscope, which does not appear to incorporate AI or machine learning.

Ask a specific question about this device