Search Results

EC-760Z-V/L is intended for the visualization of the lower digestive tract, specifically for the observation, diagnosis, and endoscopic treatment of the rectum and large intestine.

FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EC-760Z-V/L is comprised of three general sections: a control portion, an insertion portion and an umbilicus. The control portion controls the angulation of the endoscope. This portion also controls the flexibility of the distal end in the endoscope. The insertion contains glass fiber bundles, several channels and a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor in its distal end. The insertion portion assist in delivering air/suction as well as endoscope accessories, such as forceps. The glass fiber bundles allow light to travel through the endoscope and emit light from the tip of the insertion portion to illuminate the body cavity. This provides enough light to the CMOS image sensor to capture an image and display it on the monitor. The umbilicus consists of electronic components needed to operate the endoscope when plugged in to the video processor and the light source. The endoscope is used in combination with FUJIFILM's video processors, light sources and peripheral devices such as monitor, printer, foot switch, and cart.

The provided text describes the regulatory clearance for the FUJIFILM Endoscope Model EC-760Z-V/L, asserting its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, this document does not contain the specific information required to answer your request about acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance using AI assistance, human readers, or detailed ground truth establishment for AI models.

The document describes performance testing for an endoscope, which is a physical device, not an AI or software device. The performance data section refers to:

• Electrical safety
• Biocompatibility
• Reprocessing validation
• Photobiological safety
• Bench testing for "Advanced Force Transmission" and "Adaptive Bending" features
• Comparative bench testing for suction rate
• Other physical performance aspects like field of view, bending capability, air/water supply rates, working length, forceps channel diameter, viewing direction, resolution, and LG output.

For these tests, it states, "In all cases, the device met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for the test." However, the actual acceptance criteria values and the detailed results are not provided in this public summary.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information, particularly items 1 through 9, because the provided text pertains to the regulatory clearance of a physical medical device (an endoscope) and does not describe any AI/ML model performance evaluation, human-in-the-loop studies, or detailed ground truth methodologies relevant to AI.

Ask a specific question about this device