Search Results

The Fresenius Stay Safe® Cap is intended to be used for closure of the stay safe peritoneal dialysis connectology system.

The Fresenius Sterile Stay Safe® Cap is a modified version of the Fresenius Stay Safe® Cap. The modification is the cap is now sterile.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Fresenius Sterile Stay Safe® Cap. It establishes substantial equivalence to a predicate device and notes a change in sterility. However, it does not contain the detailed information required to answer your specific questions about acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert involvement, or ground truth for a performance study.

This document is a regulatory submission focused on demonstrating equivalence and safety, not on providing the results of a specific performance study in the way you've outlined. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the given text.

Here's why and what's missing:

• Acceptance Criteria & Reported Performance: The document states "testing of the Fresenius Sterile Stay Safe Cap indicates that the sterile cap is safe and effective for its intended use" (page 2, Section F). However, it does not specify what tests were conducted, what the acceptance criteria for those tests were, or what the quantitative performance results were.
• Sample Size (Test Set) & Data Provenance: This information is not present.
• Number of Experts & Qualifications: This information is not present.
• Adjudication Method: This information is not present.
• MRMC Comparative Effectiveness Study: There is no mention of a comparative effectiveness study involving human readers or AI. The submission is about a physical medical device (cap).
• Standalone Performance: While it mentions "testing," it does not specify if this was a standalone algorithm performance study (which would be irrelevant for a cap). It's likely referring to physical sterility, integrity, and compatibility testing.
• Type of Ground Truth: Not applicable in the context of device performance as usually understood for AI/diagnostic devices. For a cap, "ground truth" would relate to its physical properties meeting specifications.
• Sample Size (Training Set): Not applicable, as this is a physical device, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.
• Ground Truth for Training Set: Not applicable for the same reason as above.

Ask a specific question about this device