Search Results

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is a FORUM software application intended for the management, display, and analysis of visual field and optical coherence tomography data. The FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is indicated as an aid to the detection, measurement, and management of visual field defects and progression of visual field loss.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is also intended for generating reports that contain results from perimetry, optical coherence tomography and fundus photography.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace implements Cirrus algorithms and normative databases for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell plus inner plexiform thickness and optic nerve head measurement and Humphrey Field Analyzer algorithms and databases for visual field measurements and Guided Progression Analysis.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is a FORUM software application intended for the management, display, and analysis of visual field and optical coherence tomography data.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace implements Cirrus algorithms and normative databases for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, ganglion cell plus inner plexiform thickness and optic nerve head measurement and Humphrey Field Analyzer algorithms and databases for visual field measurements and Guided Progression Analysis.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace provides a means to review and analyze data from various visual field examinations to identify progressive visual field loss. FORUM Glaucoma Workplace utilizes Humphrey® Field Analyzer (HFA) algorithms and databases including STATPAC and Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) to process visual field data and generate visual field reports. GPA compares visual field test results of follow-up tests to an established baseline over time and determines if there is change that exceeds the expected test-retest variability.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace generates combined reports that contain results from perimetry. optical coherence tomography and fundus photography. FORUM Glaucoma Workplace implements Cirrus algorithms and databases for retinal nerve fiber laver (RNFL) thickness. ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness and optic nerve head (ONH) measurements included in these reports.

The created reports and the Guided Progression Analysis provide a comprehensive overview of the structural and functional exam results to aid health care professionals in the measurement, and management of visual field defects and progression of visual field loss.

The following are the main functionalities of FORUM Glaucoma Workplace:

• Data retrieval and report storage
• Managing, analyzing and displaying visual field exams and OCT exams
• . Creation of visual field reports and combined reports

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace retrieves HFA visual field test data from the FORUM Archive, uses the HFA algorithms and databases to process the visual field raw data, then generates and displays visual field reports.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace creates combined reports using HFA visual field exam data (functional information) and Cirrus acquisition data (structural information); fundus images stored in FORUM may also be added to the reports. The reports generated by FORUM Glaucoma Workplace are stored as DICOM Encapsulated PDFs in the FORUM Archive. FORUM Glaucoma Workplace displays interactive screens and the generated visual field reports. These reports include those previously offered by the HFA II and HFA II -i: Single Field Analysis; Three in One; Numeric; Suprathreshold; Kinetic Reports; Overview; Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) Summary, Full GPA, GPA Last Three Follow-up and Single Field Analysis (SFA) GPA.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace manages Cirrus OCT data to generate combined functional (perimetry) and structural (OCT) reports. These combined reports contain the results from perimetry, OCT and fundus photography.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace processes Cirrus OCT data by implementing the Cirrus algorithms and databases offered by Cirrus HD-OCT and CIRRUS photo. The databases offered by Cirrus HD-OCT are used within FORUM Glaucoma Workplace for comparison to Cirrus HD-OCT data; the databases offered by CIRRUS photo are used within FORUM Glaucoma Workplace for comparison to CIRRUS photo data.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace provides two types of combined reports:

• 1. 24-2/30-2 and RNFL (for Cirrus HD-OCT and CIRRUS photo data): This report presents the visual field test result comprised of either the 24-2 or 30-2 test pattern combined with a Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) report.
• 2. 10-2 and GCA (only for Cirrus HD-OCT data): This report presents a visual field test result comprised of the central 10-2 test pattern combined with a Ganglion Cell Analysis (GCA) report.

Elements from the visual field reports that are provided in the Combined Reports include the Graytone plot, Pattern Deviation and Total Deviation plots (using probability symbols) and a kev to the probability symbols. In addition, the Reliability Indices (Fixation Losses; False Positive errors; False Negative errors) and Global Indices [Visual Field Index (VFI); Mean Deviation (MD); Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD) and Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT)] are provided.

Elements from the Cirrus OCT reports that are provided in the Combined Report include the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (RNFL) Deviation Map, Average RNFL Thickness and Optic Nerve Head Summary. FORUM Glaucoma Workplace also provides the Ganglion Cell Analysis (GCA) Thickness Deviation Map and GCA parameters table for Cirrus HD-OCT data.

After launching FORUM Glaucoma Workplace from the FORUM application, the user can select from four tabs: Visual Fields; Overview; GPA and Create Reports. Within these tabs, FORUM Glaucoma Workplace provides tools for the management, display and analysis of visual field exam data and the creation of reports.

Visual Fields Tab

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace displays a range of visual field tests (Threshold, Suprathreshold and Kinetic) that have been stored in FORUM. The exam list includes the exam date, test pattern, test strategy, and the stimulus color, size, and background for each selected patient. From the Visual Field tab, users can create reports for later retrieval in FORUM Viewer and/or be printed.

Overview Tab

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace creates and displays visual field reports for visual field tests provided the visual field examination results have been stored in FORUM. These reports include the Overview and Single Field Analysis. The Overview report contains the data of all existing tests selected. The Single Field Analysis report contains data from a single central threshold test.

GPA Tab

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace contains the same GPA algorithms and databases as offered in the Humphrey Field Analyzer II and II-i and allows GPA to be performed on a computer running FORUM independent of and apart from the visual field instrument itself. Within the GPA tab, GPA information is provided on interactive screens.

GPA analysis can be performed for any patient who has at least two baseline visual field tests. These tests must have been performed with the Full Threshold, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard, or SITA Fast strategies. Also, at least one follow-up visual field test must have been performed using either the SITA Standard or SITA Fast test strategy. With FORUM Glaucoma Workplace, the user can set an optional, second baseline.

From the GPA tab, users can create four types of GPA reports: Full GPA, GPA Summary, GPA Last Three Follow-up and Single Field Analysis (SFA) GPA. A Single Field Analysis report can also be created within the GPA tab.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace allows the user to interact with the available data. When viewing the GPA on the screen, the user can hold the mouse pointer over a particular area and a small tooltip will appear with details regarding the particular test. In addition, the user can add notes about an exam through the Comments feature and view previous comments about any exam.

Create Reports Tab

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace provides the user with the option of creating different report types, such as Single Field Analysis, Kinetic, or Suprathreshold using exam data stored in FORUM. Several reports of the same type can also be generated in one simple procedure, for example, if the user wants to create or print Single Field Analysis reports for every Threshold exam for a particular patient.

Technological Characteristics

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is connected to FORUM via an internal interface; it consists of a server and client that integrate into an existing FORUM Archive and Viewer installation. Once FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is installed and licensed, the new functionality becomes available in FORUM Viewer.

The FORUM Glaucoma Workplace server is installed on the FORUM server. The data access components are located on the server. The server installation enables FORUM Glaucoma Workplace to retrieve HFA and OCT exam data stored in the FORUM Archive. It also contains the algorithms and databases for data management and creation of visual field reports and reports that contain results from perimetry, optical coherence tomography, and fundus photography (Combined Reports).

The client is installed on the FORUM Viewer. The display components are located on the client. The client installation enables FORUM Glaucoma Workplace to display visual field results, optical coherence tomography data and the user interaction information.

The reports are displayed on a computer monitor with interactive screens using the FORUM Viewer. The created reports may be stored as DICOM Encapsulated PDFs in the FORUM Archive.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text, outlining the acceptance criteria and study details for the FORUM® Glaucoma Workplace device:

The provided document describes the FORUM® Glaucoma Workplace, a software application for managing, displaying, and analyzing visual field and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data in the context of glaucoma. It states that the device implements existing validated algorithms and normative databases (Cirrus/Humphrey Field Analyzer) for its analyses and report generation.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

While the document doesn't present a formal "acceptance criteria" table with specific quantitative thresholds, it describes the expected performance and verification that was conducted. The core acceptance criterion can be inferred as the device performing equivalently and as intended compared to the predicate devices and the original algorithms it implements.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Test Set Sample Size: The document mentions "representative data (sample data that is representative of true clinical cases)" was used for clinical functionalities validation by ophthalmologists. However, no specific numerical sample size for this test set is provided.
• Data Provenance: The data used for comparative testing (HFA II-i, Cirrus HD-OCT, CIRRUS photo data compared against FORUM Glaucoma Workplace generated reports) is implied to be existing clinical data from these devices. The document does not specify the country of origin of this data, nor explicitly states if it was retrospective or prospective. Given it's "test data to verify that the results contained in both reports were equivalent," it's likely pre-existing (retrospective) data.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts:

• Number of Experts: "Ophthalmologists in three countries" participated in the validation of clinical functionalities. The exact number of ophthalmologists is not specified.
• Qualifications of Experts: They are identified as "ophthalmologists," implying medical doctors specializing in eye care, which is highly relevant to the device's application. No specific years of experience or sub-specialization are mentioned.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

The document describes the ophthalmologists completing "questionnaires rating the various aspects of the software." It does not explicitly mention a formal adjudication method like 2+1 or 3+1 for resolving discrepancies in evaluations. The validation seems to have focused on confirming functionality and usability, rather than a diagnostic performance comparison that would typically require adjudicators for ground truth.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance:

• MRMC Study: No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not conducted as described in the provided text. The study involved ophthalmologists validating the software's functionalities and output, not comparing human reader performance with and without AI assistance for diagnostic tasks.
• Effect Size: Therefore, there is no reported effect size for human reader improvement with or without AI assistance from this documentation. The device is primarily an advanced PACS/data management and analysis tool, not a new AI diagnostic algorithm.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:

Yes, a form of standalone performance evaluation was done indirectly. The document states: "As part of the verification testing, the visual field reports generated on the HFA II-i and OCT test reports generated on the Cirrus HD-OCT and CIRRUS photo were compared to the reports generated by FORUM Glaucoma Workplace using the same test data to verify that the results contained in both reports were equivalent." This comparison verifies that the algorithms implemented within FORUM Glaucoma Workplace (which are existing, validated algorithms from the HFA and Cirrus devices) produce the same outputs as the original devices when given the same input data, essentially confirming the "algorithm only" performance.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

The ground truth for the comparison appears to be the outputs (reports/results) from the predicate devices themselves (HFA II-i, Cirrus HD-OCT, CIRRUS photo). The FORUM Glaucoma Workplace's outputs (reports and analyses) were verified to be equivalent to these established predicate device outputs. For the clinical functionalities validation, the "ground truth" was likely the expected correct functioning and usability based on expert opinion and predefined functional requirements, evaluated by ophthalmologists.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

The document does not specify any training set sample size. This is expected, as FORUM Glaucoma Workplace implements existing and validated algorithms and normative databases from the HFA and Cirrus devices. It does not describe a new, independently developed machine learning algorithm that would require its own separate training set. The "training" of the algorithms (e.g., GPA, normative databases) would have been done during the development and validation of the original HFA and Cirrus devices, which are referenced as predicates.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

As no new algorithm with an independent training set is described, this question is not directly applicable to the FORUM Glaucoma Workplace itself. The ground truth for the underlying algorithms (HFA's GPA, Cirrus's normative databases, etc.) would have been established during their original development and validation, likely through extensive clinical studies and expert consensus on diagnostic criteria for glaucoma and visual field/OCT measurements. The current submission relies on the established validity of these pre-existing algorithms.

Ask a specific question about this device

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is a FORUM software application intended for the management, display, and analysis of visual field data. The FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is indicated as an aid to the detection, measurement, and management of progression of visual field loss.

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace is a FORUM software application that provides a means to review and analyze data from various visual field examinations to identify statistically significant and progressive visual field loss. FORUM Glaucoma Workplace utilizes Humphrey® Field Analyzer (HFA) algorithms and databases including STATPAC and Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) to process visual field data and generate visual field reports. GPA compares visual field test results of follow-up tests to an established baseline over time and determines if there is statistically significant change.

The following are the main functionalities of FORUM Glaucoma Workplace:

• . Data retrieval and report storage
• . Managing, analyzing and displaying visual field exams
• Creation of visual field reports .

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace retrieves HFA visual field test data from the FORUM Archive. uses the HFA algorithms and databases to process the visual field raw data, then generates and displays visual field reports. The reports generated by FORUM Glaucoma Workplace are stored as DICOM Encapsulated PDFs in the FORUM Archive.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information for the FORUM Glaucoma Workplace device, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided text does not explicitly state quantitative (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) acceptance criteria with numerical targets. Instead, the acceptance criteria are generally framed around demonstrating functional equivalence to predicate devices and adherence to design specifications. The performance testing focused on verifying that the device performs as intended and that its generated reports are equivalent to those from predicate devices.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Test Set Description: The verification testing involved comparing visual field reports generated on the HFA II-i to reports generated by FORUM Glaucoma Workplace using the same test data. Clinical functionality validation used "representative data (sample data that is representative of true clinical cases)."
• Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated. The document mentions "the same test data" for report comparison and "representative data" for clinical validation, but no specific number of cases or patients is provided for either.
• Data Provenance:
  • For the report comparison: The data originated from the HFA II-i, which is a predicate device.
  • For clinical functionality validation: "representative data (sample data that is representative of true clinical cases)". The country of origin of this specific data is not stated or implied. However, the validation participants were ophthalmologists in "two countries."
  • Retrospective or Prospective: Not explicitly stated, but the mention of "same test data" and "representative data" suggests it was likely retrospective (pre-existing data).

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

• Number of Experts: Unclear how many individual ophthalmologists participated in the clinical functionality validation. It states "ophthalmologists in two countries."
• Qualifications of Experts: Ophthalmologists. No specific experience level (e.g., "10 years of experience") is provided.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Adjudication Method: Not explicitly described. For the report comparison, it states "to verify that the results contained in both reports were equivalent," implying direct comparison. For clinical validation, ophthalmologists "completed questionnaires rating the various aspects of the software," which doesn't suggest a formal adjudication process for establishing a ground truth.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

• Was an MRMC study done? No. The submission describes functional equivalence testing and clinical validation, but not a comparative effectiveness study designed to measure human reader performance with and without AI assistance.
• Effect Size: Not applicable, as no MRMC study was conducted.

6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance)

• Was a standalone study done? Yes, implicitly. The core of the "Performance Data" section describes verification that the FORUM Glaucoma Workplace's algorithms and data processing produce results "equivalent" to the predicate HFA II-i algorithms. This involved comparing the outputs of the software (reports) directly against the predicate device's outputs using the "same test data." This is a form of standalone performance assessment, as it focuses on the algorithm's output matching a known, accepted standard.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

• The ground truth for the comparison of reports and algorithms was based on the outputs and accepted performance of predicate devices (Humphrey® Field Analyzer II and II-i, and their GPA/STATPAC algorithms). Essentially, the "ground truth" was established by the existing, legally marketed and deemed safe/effective predicate technologies.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not applicable / Not explicitly stated. The FORUM Glaucoma Workplace primarily implements existing, validated HFA algorithms (STATPAC and GPA). The text does not describe a new machine learning algorithm that would require a distinct "training set" in the conventional sense of AI/ML development. It leverages established algorithms and databases.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

• Not applicable / Not explicitly stated. As there's no mention of a new machine learning model being trained by the applicant, the concept of a "training set ground truth" is not relevant in this submission. The algorithms themselves (STATPAC, GPA) were developed and validated years prior by the manufacturer of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

Ask a specific question about this device