Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K965146
    Date Cleared
    1997-03-10

    (77 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4200
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    FLAT CLOSED WOUND DRAIN WITH TROCAR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    To drainage excessive body fluid away from the wound site in the Surgery or after Surgery

    Device Description

    This Axiom Closed Wound Drain with Trocar is simplicity of design assures effective operation with added convenience. The sterile single-patient-use component includes the following: Radiopaque silicone flat drain with multiple perforations. These perforations are located at the end of the drain. Unique interlocking supports run the full length of the flat drain to maintain ample lumen and ensure unhindered flow. Various sizes starting from 4 mm up to 13 mm for flat drain with Trocars will be offered. Silicone round drain with radiopaque line that allows assessment of drain placement after wound closure. An evenly spaced perforations are created to enhance drainage from several directions, these perforations are positioned in alternate 90 degree planes. Various sizes starting from 7 French up to 19 French gauge with Trocars will be offered. Trocar are manufactured from stainless steel. The one end of the trocar is razor sharp to able to make a stab wound with less trauma and the opposite end has barb type fitting or beads blasted surface on small size trocars for silicone wound drain attachment. Trocars will be offered in different length and various matching diameters to silicone wound drain.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Axiom Closed Wound Drain With Trocar) and does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert involvement as requested in your prompt. The document focuses on product description, intended use, and substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific details about acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria based solely on the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1