Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K132600
    Date Cleared
    2013-10-02

    (43 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.4760
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    FACIAL PREBENT PLATING WITH VIRTUAL SURGICAL PLANNING

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    These devices are implantable bone plates and bone screws for facial procedures including: 1. Fractures - 2. Osteotomies - 3. Reconstructive procedures - 4. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed

    Device Description

    The Biomet Microfixation Facial PreBent Plates with Virtual Surgical Planning is comprised of a variety of titanium plates with shapes and sizes designed for internal fixation for Facial reconstruction procedures. The plates include variations of straight, angle, curved, L-shape, Tshape, double T-shape, Z-shape, Y-shape, double Y-shape, H-shape, triangle, square, rectangle, matrix, orbital floor, LeFort, and chin options with various lengths and thickness. Plates are offered flat or pre-bent plates are contoured by Biomet Microfixation per surgeon specifications or patient specific anatomical model and include patient specific guides and instruments, of the VSP System (K120956, cleared December 12, 2012). The VSP System is used by Medical Modeling to create the guides, instrumentation and a patient specific anatomical model from CT scans provided by a surgeon. Medical Modeling uses the surgeon information to create the anatomical patient specific model. The anatomical patient specific model is then used to aide in proper alignment and bending of the plates previously cleared under K121589 (cleared 9/21/12). This bending process is conducted at Biomet Microfixation based on our process specification and inspection criteria previously cleared with K121589.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and supporting study for the Biomet Microfixation Facial PreBent Plates with Virtual Surgical Planning:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Stated or Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Material: Identical to predicate device."The subject Facial PreBent Plates with Virtual Surgical Planning devices are identical to the predicate devices in terms of indications, use, material, and design."
    Design: Identical to predicate device with an optional pre-bending process using VSP System."The subject Facial PreBent Plates with Virtual Surgical Planning devices are identical to the predicate devices in terms of indications, use, material, and design. The only difference...is that the subject device, is not only shaped based on an anatomical specific model, but also the provided patient specific guides and instruments of the VSP System...where the predicate pre-bent plates are shaped based on an anatomical specific model only."
    Indications for Use: Same as predicate device."When compared to the predicate devices...substantial equivalence is based on the same indications for use..." (Also explicitly listed: Fractures, Osteotomies, Reconstructive procedures, Revision procedures).
    Manufacturing Process & Verification: Bending process conducted at Biomet Microfixation based on process specification and inspection criteria. Plates are verified to match the anatomical model."Biomet Microfixation has a process specification for bending plates and an inspection criteria to verify the plate matches the anatomical model. Because the plates are verified to a patient specific model they are 100% verified to the Medical Modeling output, anatomical model, for every case."
    Safety & Effectiveness: No new issues; performs as well as predicate device."Based on the determination that no clinical or non-clinical testing was deemed necessary, it can be concluded that the subject devices...do not raise any new issues of safety and effectiveness and perform as well as the predicate devices."

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable. No clinical or non-clinical testing was performed as the device was deemed substantially equivalent based on its identical characteristics to a previously cleared predicate device, with an additional pre-bending service.
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable. No test set data was generated for this submission. The rationale for substantial equivalence relied on the predicate device's existing clearance and the verification process for the pre-bending.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    • Not applicable. No test set was used, and therefore no ground truth was established by experts for a test set. The pre-bent plate's congruence to the anatomical model is verified through an internal inspection process by Biomet Microfixation, which aligns with their process specification and inspection criteria.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Not applicable. No test set was used.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • Not applicable. This device is a physical bone plate and not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers. No MRMC study was conducted.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This device is a physical medical implant, not an algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    • For the verification of the pre-bent plates, the "ground truth" is the patient-specific anatomical model created by Medical Modeling from CT scans. The plates are 100% verified against this model. This is essentially a form of design verification/conformance to a patient-specific digital template/model.
    • For the overall device clearance, the ground truth is implicitly tied to the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate device (K121589).

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not applicable. This document describes a medical device (bone plates) submission, not an AI algorithm that requires a training set. The "VSP System" mentioned generates patient-specific anatomical models and guides, but the submission does not detail its development as an AI system requiring a 'training set'.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not applicable, as no training set for an algorithm is described.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1