Search Results

M1 is used to reduce the circumference of the hips, waist and is indicated for use as a noninvasive dermatological.

M2 is intended to emit energy in the visible and infrared region of the spectrum for use in the treatment of full-face wrinkles.

M3 is intended to emit energy in the visible and IR spectrum intended to provide topical heating for the purpose of elevating tissue temperature for a temporary relief of minor muscle and joint pain and stiffness, minor arthritis, pain or muscle spasm, the temporary increase in local blood circulation, and the temporary relaxation of muscles.

The EnergyLounger, Model: TY-01 a device designed similar to a recliner, with 1260 LED lights, a switch for power on/off, and it can automatically stop treatment after 20 minutes use for M1/M2 and after 30 minutes use for M3, 2 buttons for mode selection, and an AC power supply for power supply.

The LED in the EnergyLounger, Model: TY-01 is a 1W imitation current light. It's a 4-in-1 LED, including 630nm, 630nm, 850nm and 940nm.The EnergyLounger, Model: TY-01 includes a detailed Instruction Manual, operators need to read the instructions carefully before use.

This device uses three types of LEDs and has three working modes, which can be selected by the user by pressing a button.

The device consists of an Energy Lounger, power cable, Product protect cover, Reflector, Goggles and User Manual.

I'm sorry, but this document does not contain the detailed information necessary to entirely fulfill your request. The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter and a 510(k) summary for a medical device called "EnergyLounger (TY-01)".

While it discusses the device's indications for use, its comparison to predicate devices, and non-clinical tests performed (electrical safety, EMC, biocompatibility, usability validation), it explicitly states:

"Clinical testing was not needed for this 510(k). The non-clinical performance testing described above is sufficient to support that the device can be used safely and effectively."

This means there was no clinical study, human reader study, or establishment of ground truth regarding clinical outcomes (e.g., reduction of hip/waist circumference, treatment of wrinkles, pain relief) performed for this submission. Therefore, I cannot provide information on:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to clinical effectiveness. The acceptance criteria mentioned are for non-clinical aspects like electrical safety and biocompatibility.
• Sample size used for the test set (clinical).
• Number of experts used to establish ground truth for the test set.
• Adjudication method for the test set.
• MRMC comparative effectiveness study.
• Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
• Type of ground truth used (clinical outcomes/pathology).
• Sample size for the training set (clinical data).
• How ground truth for the training set was established.

The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on technological characteristics and non-clinical safety/performance standards, rather than direct clinical efficacy trials.

However, I can extract information about the non-clinical acceptance criteria and tests:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance (Non-Clinical):

Regarding the other points, as stated above, the document explicitly indicates that no clinical testing was performed or needed for this 510(k). Therefore, questions related to clinical test sets, ground truth establishment for clinical outcomes, or human reader studies cannot be answered from this document.

Ask a specific question about this device