Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K201832
    Date Cleared
    2021-09-17

    (442 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.1720
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Endoeye Flex Deflectable Videoscope Olympus LTF-S190-5

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    This instrument is intended to be used with a video system center, light source, documentation equipment, monitor. hand instruments, electrosurgical unit, and other ancillary equipment for endoscopic surgery within the thoracic and abdominal cavities including female reproductive organs.

    Device Description

    The LTF-S190-5 is a video endoscope consisting of three parts: the control section, the insertion section, and the connector section. The device uses an objective lens and light guide lens for capturing images/videos from the distal end of the endoscope.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and supporting studies for the ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-5:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriterionDevice Performance / Result
    ReprocessingAll reprocessing methods (Sterilizer/Sterilization process) were validated following FDA guidance "Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling" (March 17, 2015). The acceptance criteria were met.
    BiocompatibilityTested in accordance with FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, and specific sub-parts:
    - Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009)
    - Intracutaneous (ISO 10993-10:2010)
    - Sensitization (ISO 10993-10:2010)
    - Acute Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11:2006)
    - Rabbit Pyrogen (USP , USP )
    The device was shown to be non-cytotoxic, non-irritating, non-sensitizing, not systemically toxic, and non-pyrogenetic.
    Software V&VSoftware verification and validation testing conducted following FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" and "Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices". The device met all requirements.
    Electrical SafetyTested in accordance with ANSI/AAMI ES 60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, and IEC 60601-2-18:2009. The system complies with these standards.
    EMCTested in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2:2014. The system complies with this standard.
    Bench PerformanceBench testing included:
    - Thermal safety test
    - Composite durability test
    - Color (imaging) performance
    - Photobiological Safety
    Device performance was assessed against design requirements, including process verification, design verification, and design validation. The device met all acceptance criteria.

    2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance

    The provided text describes various engineering and performance tests (reprocessing, biocompatibility, software V&V, electrical safety, EMC, and bench performance). These types of tests typically do not involve "test sets" in the clinical sense with human data. Instead, they involve testing the physical device, its materials, and its software against established technical and safety standards.

    • No "sample size" for a clinical test set is mentioned.
    • No "data provenance" (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for clinical data is mentioned, as clinical data was not part of this submission's performance data section. The submission focuses on substantial equivalence based on technical characteristics and non-clinical performance data.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth Establishment

    Not applicable. The performance data presented are based on engineering tests and adherence to recognized standards, not on expert-established ground truth from clinical cases.

    4. Adjudication Method for Test Set

    Not applicable. There is no clinical test set requiring adjudication in the provided performance data.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study is mentioned. This evaluation focuses on the safety and effectiveness of the device itself, rather than comparing human reader performance with and without AI assistance. The device is a videoscope, not an AI diagnostic tool.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

    Not applicable. This device is a physical videoscope, not an algorithm, so a standalone algorithm-only performance study is not relevant.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the various performance tests is defined by:

    • Established national and international standards (e.g., FDA guidance documents, ISO 10993, ANSI/AAMI ES 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2)
    • Manufacturer's design specifications and requirements.

    8. Sample Size for Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is a physical videoscope, not a machine learning model, so there is no concept of a "training set."

    9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as there is no training set mentioned or implied for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1