Search Results

Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG is a conductive paste used with surface electrodes to lower skin-electrode impedance. It can be used with electrodes for EEG and EMG examination.

The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG is the electroconductive media used with external electrodes to reduce the impedance (resistance to alternating current) of the contact between the electrode surface and the skin. The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG is an aqueous based material with Sodium Chloride as the conductive material combined with emulsifiers, humectants and preservatives. The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG has been designed to have increased stiffness and improved temperature resistance compared to its predecessor, the predicate device. These changes allow the paste to stay in place better as desired by its users. The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG has a neutral pH compared to the slightly alkaline pH of the predicate.

The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG is available in two models: ZV-401E and ZV-181E. ZV-401E is a container filled with 400 g of the paste. ZV-181E is a tube filled with 180g of the paste.

The Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG is intended to be used by qualified medical personnel within a medical facility. It can be used with electrodes for electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) examination.

The document provided details for the Elefix V Paste for EEG & EMG, an electroconductive media. While the document discusses performance data and various tests conducted, it does not contain information typically associated with studies demonstrating the performance of AI/ML-driven medical devices, such as those related to effect size, human readers with or without AI assistance, or details on ground truth establishment for training sets.

Here's the information that could be extracted from the provided text, primarily related to bench testing of the device's physical properties:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document mentions "performance testing" and "design verification and validation testing," but does not specify the sample size for these tests for pH, impedance, stiffness, or temperature resistance. The data provenance is also not specified.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not applicable as the tests conducted were for physical and chemical properties of a conductive paste, not for diagnostic accuracy or interpretation requiring expert consensus.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable as the tests conducted were for physical and chemical properties and did not involve human interpretation or adjudication.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This information is not applicable as the device is an electroconductive paste, not an AI-driven diagnostic or interpretative system. Therefore, an MRMC study related to AI assistance for human readers would not be relevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable as the device is an electroconductive paste, not a standalone algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the physical property tests, the "ground truth" or reference was based on established physical and chemical measurement standards for impedance, pH, conductivity, and stiffness. For biocompatibility, it was based on ISO 10993 standards.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable as the device is not an AI/ML system and therefore does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable as the device is not an AI/ML system and therefore does not have a "training set."

Ask a specific question about this device