Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K991057
    Date Cleared
    1999-05-20

    (51 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1000
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    EXTRA LARGE BODY COIL FOR OPART (MRT-600)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Imaging of:

    • -The Whole Body (including head, abdomen, breast, pelvis, limbs and extremities, spine, neck, TMJ, heart, blood vessels). [Application terms include MRCP (MR Cholangiopancreatography), MR Urography, MR Myelography, MR Fluoroscopy, SAS (Surface Anatomy Scan), Dynamic Scan and Cine Imaging.]
    • Fluid Visualization -
    • -2D/3D Imaging
    • MR Angiography/MR Vascular Imaging -
    Device Description

    The Extra Large Body coil is an enlarged version of the current OPART™ Large Body Coil. This coil is an optional coil which was developed to allow positioning of larger sized patients in the OPART™ system. The Extra Large Body coil can be used as a standalone coil, or in conjunction with the T-spine surface coil (cleared with OPART™ system K962933). Signal is received in QD mode when used in conjunction with the T-spine surface coil.
    The Extra Large Body Coil is constructed with the same materials that are currently in use for the released coil set for OPART™.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the design and regulatory approval of an "Extra Large Body Coil" for an MRI system, the OPART™. The information provided primarily focuses on establishing the device's substantial equivalence to a previously cleared device, rather than a clinical study evaluating its performance against specific acceptance criteria in a medical context.

    Based on the provided text, there is no clinical study that explicitly defines and proves the device meets specific performance acceptance criteria in the way typically expected for a diagnostic AI/medical device. Instead, the submission focuses on substantial equivalence for a physical component (the coil) of an MRI system.

    Here's an analysis of the requested information based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The concept of "acceptance criteria" for algorithms or diagnostic performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC) is not applicable here because this is a hardware accessory submission based on substantial equivalence. The "performance" being evaluated is related to physical and safety parameters of the MRI coil.

    Acceptance Criteria (Benchmarking/Safety/Physical)Reported Device Performance (Extra Large Body Coil)
    Safety Parameters:
    Maximum static field strength0.35 Tesla
    Rate of change of magnetic field19 T/second
    Maximum radio frequency power deposition (SAR)
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1