Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K983741
    Date Cleared
    1998-12-18

    (57 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1320
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Input:

    Intended Use / Indications for Use

    The Everlast Neurostimulation Electrodes are intended for use with transcutaneous neurostimulation devices.

    Product codes

    GXY

    Device Description

    Not Found

    Mentions image processing

    Not Found

    Mentions AI, DNN, or ML

    Not Found

    Input Imaging Modality

    Not Found

    Anatomical Site

    Not Found

    Indicated Patient Age Range

    Not Found

    Intended User / Care Setting

    Not Found

    Description of the training set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

    Not Found

    Description of the test set, sample size, data source, and annotation protocol

    Not Found

    Summary of Performance Studies

    Not Found

    Key Metrics

    Not Found

    Predicate Device(s)

    Not Found

    Reference Device(s)

    Not Found

    Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) - All Relevant Information

    Not Found

    The Everlast Neurostimulation Electrodes are intended for use with transcutaneous neurostimulation devices.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the "Everlast Neurostimulation Electrodes." This document primarily addresses the substantial equivalence of the device to a previously marketed predicate device and grants permission to market the product.

    Crucially, the document does not contain information regarding acceptance criteria, a study proving the device meets those criteria, or any details about a clinical study's methodology (sample size, ground truth, expert qualifications, adjudication, MRMC studies, or standalone performance).

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The 510(k) clearance process often relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which may involve non-clinical testing and comparison of device characteristics rather than a full-scale clinical trial with acceptance criteria specific to its performance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1