Search Results

The OTC Pain Relief TENS, model EV-804, is intended for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles in the low back as well as upper and lower extremities (arm and/or leg) due to strain from exercise or normal household and work activities

Not Found

The provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Everyway Medical Instruments Co., Ltd. EV-804 OTC Pain Relief TENS device. It details the device's classification, regulatory status, and intended use as a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for pain relief.

However, the document does NOT contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study methodologies, sample sizes, expert qualifications, ground truth establishment, or any other details typically associated with the performance evaluation of a device, especially an AI/ML-driven one.

This is a standard 510(k) clearance letter, which means the device was found to be "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This equivalence is often based on existing technological characteristics and indications for use, rather than extensive, new performance studies that would require the type of detailed information requested in your prompt. For TENS devices, substantial equivalence is usually demonstrated through electrical performance testing, labeling review, and comparison to existing devices on the market, not through clinical studies akin to those for AI-powered diagnostics.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This information is not present.
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and data provenance: No such test set or data is described.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable as no such test set or ground truth establishment is mentioned.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: No, this is not mentioned. The device is a simple TENS unit, not an imaging or diagnostic AI.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
7. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

The document is purely administrative regarding regulatory clearance and does not delve into the technical performance study details you're looking for, especially those related to AI/ML device validation.

Ask a specific question about this device