Search Results

For etching dentin and enamel.

Not Found

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental etching gel, not a study report detailing performance criteria and results of a device. Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted directly from the provided text.

Based on the information provided:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not available. The document is a 510(k) summary, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting detailed performance criteria and results from a clinical or analytical study.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable/Not available. This document does not describe a clinical or analytical study with a test set.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable/Not available.

4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable/Not available.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a chemical product (etching gel), not an AI-assisted diagnostic or therapeutic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This device is an etching gel.

7. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable/Not available for a clinical study. For substantial equivalence, the "ground truth" is that the new device has "substantially similar" chemical composition, intended use, performance, indications, labels, and instructions for use to the predicate device.

8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable/Not available. This document does not pertain to a machine learning or AI algorithm where a "training set" would be used.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable/Not available.

Summary based on the provided text:

The document describes the submission of a 510(k) premarket notification for an "ETCHING GEL" manufactured by S & C Polymer GmbH. The purpose of this notification is to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, "ETCH GEL" by HENRY SCHEIN.

The key information regarding "acceptance criteria" and "study" in this context is centered around the concept of substantial equivalence as defined by the FDA for medical devices.

• Acceptance Criteria (Implicit for 510(k) clearance): The "acceptance criteria" for 510(k) clearance in this case is that the device, ETCHING GEL, is "substantially equivalent" to a predicate device ("ETCH GEL" by HENRY SCHEIN). This means it must have:

  • The same intended use.
  • The same technological characteristics (or if different, that the differences do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness).
  • Similar performance, indications, proposed labels, and instructions for use.
  • A chemical composition commonly found in current dental materials.

• Study That Proves the Device Meets Acceptance Criteria: The "study" here is the 510(k) premarket notification process itself, which involves providing documentation to the FDA to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The document states:

  • "The chemical composition and use of ETCHING GEL is substantially equivalent to 'ETCH GEL', a product manufactured and marketed as an own brand by HENRY SCHEIN."
  • "S & C Polymer GmbH's and HENRY SCHEIN's intended use, performance, indications, proposed labels and instructions for use (see attached) are substantially similar to the predicted device (see attached)."

Therefore, the "proof" that the device meets the "acceptance criteria" (of substantial equivalence) is the assertion and supporting documentation within the 510(k) application, which compares the new device to the predicate device across various attributes. This is not a formal clinical trial or performance study as might be conducted for novel, higher-risk devices or software.

Ask a specific question about this device