Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(60 days)
ERBEFLO Olympus Scope Port Connector
The Olympus® Scope Port Connector is intended to attach the irrigation line of an ERBEFLO 2, ERBEFLO CleverCap® and ERBEFLO CleverCap CO2 Tubing/Cap Set designated for an Olympus Gastrointestinal Video Endoscope for irrigation in endoscopic procedures.
In general; the ERBEFLO® Olympus® Scope Port Connector will be manufactured with medical grade materials or agents used in the medical device industry such as plastics, silicone, adhesive, etc. The device adjoins an irrigation line of an of an ERBEFLO 2, ERBEFLO CleverCap®, and ERBEFLO CleverCap CO2 Tubing/Cap Set designated for an Olympus Scope to an Olympus Gastrointestinal Video Endoscope for irrigation in endoscopic procedures. The Port Connector has a standard female luer lock connection that attaches to a designated Olympus ERBEFLO Tubing/Cap Set, check (backflow) valve, and housing (a scope specific connector for an Olympus Scope). The Port Connector is provided sterile, is single patient use and is disposable.
The provided text describes the ERBEFLO® Olympus® Scope Port Connector and its 510(k) submission, confirming its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, it does not contain the specific information requested about acceptance criteria for device performance, the study that proves it meets those criteria, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment relevant to AI/algorithm performance.
The document focuses on the regulatory clearance process for a physical medical device (a port connector), not a device involving an algorithm or AI. Therefore, most of the requested fields are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this text.
I can, however, extract the information that is present:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
| Acceptance Criteria (Evaluation/Test Type) | Reported Device Performance (Conclusion) |
|---|---|
| Biological Evaluation | Demonstrated no biocompatibility issues with materials used. |
| 2X Sterilization Functional Testing | Upon 2X sterilization, visual inspection, connections testing, leak and flow testing, and back flow pressure testing demonstrated that the device met established performance specifications. |
| Packaging Evaluation | Demonstrated adequacy and integrity of the packaging. |
| Sterilization Evaluation | Demonstrated product sterility and that the Connector met ethylene oxide residual requirements based on recognized standards. |
The following requested information is not present in the provided text as the document pertains to a physical medical device and not an AI/algorithmic device:
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not applicable for a physical connector.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience): Not applicable.
- Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable.
- If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable. The evaluations are for material biocompatibility, functional performance, packaging, and sterility of a physical device.
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1