Search Results

The ER150/M2 is a video monitor intended to display viewable images transmitted by standard video signals during surgical or diagnostic procedures, particularly in endoscopy.

Device Description

The ER150/M2 is a color video monitor intended to display viewable medical images transmitted by standard video signals. In particular, the device is intended for use as part of a visualisation system in endoscopic surgery. The monitor accepts and processes composite=FBAS, Y-UV, analog RGB, digital RGB, Y/C signals and NTSC, PAL and SECAM standard video signals. The ER150/M2 is designed with a digital microprocessor and offers an automatic input selection. The received signal is displayed on a 20" screen. The images can be adjusted by the user for color, contrast, hue, brightness, enhanced sharpness and color temperature (6500K or 9300K). Additional output sockets of the ER150/M2 allow the connection to further equipment including a second monitor or recording device.

AI/ML Overview

This 510(k) summary describes a medical video monitor, the ER150/M2, which is an accessory to an endoscope. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study for novel acceptance criteria.

Therefore, many of the requested details regarding acceptance criteria, study design, and performance metrics are not applicable or available in the provided text. The device is a monitor, and its "performance" is primarily defined by its ability to display signals effectively, conforming to established standards for medical monitors.

Here's a breakdown of the available information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria	Reported Device Performance
Regulatory Compliance:
21 C.F.R. § 81020.10 (Performance Standard)	Meets the requirements of 21 C.F.R. § 81020.10.
IEC 60601-1 (Medical Electrical Equipment - General Requirements for Safety)	Complies with IEC 60601-1.
IEC 60601-1-2 (Medical Electrical Equipment - General Requirements for Safety - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility)	Complies with IEC 60601-1-2.
Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC	Conforms to Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC.
UL2601-1 (Underwriters Laboratories Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment)	Meets the requirements of UL2601-1.
Functional Equivalence to Predicate:
Ability to display viewable medical images transmitted by standard video signals during surgical/diagnostic procedures, particularly in endoscopy.	Intended use, design, and technological characteristics are similar to the Sony Trinitron Color Video Monitor PVM-1343 MD (K885042).
Ability to process various standard video signals (composite=FBAS, Y-UV, analog RGB, digital RGB, Y/C, NTSC, PAL, SECAM).	Accepts and processes these signals.
Automatic input selection.	Designed with a digital microprocessor and offers automatic input selection.
Display on a 20" screen.	Received signal is displayed on a 20" screen.
User-adjustable image parameters (color, contrast, hue, brightness, enhanced sharpness, color temperature).	Images can be adjusted by the user for these parameters.
Additional output sockets for connection to other equipment (e.g., second monitor, recording device).	Offers additional output sockets.
Differences from predicate limited to picture quality and handling convenience, not raising new safety/effectiveness questions.	Stated that differences are limited to picture quality and handling convenience and do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

Not applicable. This submission is for product clearance based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device and compliance with general performance and safety standards, not a clinical study involving a "test set" of patient data. The "test" in this context refers to engineering and quality assurance testing against the listed standards.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Not applicable. As this isn't a clinical study, there was no ground truth for a test set established by medical experts in the way that would be done for an AI diagnostic device. The "ground truth" for a medical monitor is its adherence to technical specifications and regulatory standards, which are evaluated through engineering tests and regulatory review.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. There was no clinical ground truth requiring adjudication. Compliance with technical standards would be determined by testing procedures outlined within those standards and reviewed by the manufacturer's quality control and ultimately by the FDA.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If So, What was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is a medical monitor, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. No MRMC study was performed, and there is no AI component described.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was Done

Not applicable. As described, this is a hardware device (a monitor) with no standalone algorithm.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" in this context is the established technical and safety standards for medical monitors (e.g., IEC 60601-1, UL2601-1, 21 C.F.R. § 81020.10) and general device requirements for substantial equivalence. The device's performance is measured against these objective, predefined criteria through engineering and compliance testing. It is not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in a clinical sense.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This is a hardware device; there is no "training set" in the machine learning sense. The design and development process would involve iterative engineering and testing, but not training data for an algorithm.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

Not applicable. There is no training set.

Ask a Question

Ask a specific question about this device

Page 1 of 1