Search Results

The US Endoscopy Endoscopic Suture Cutter Device is intended to be used in conjunction with an endoscope to grasp and cut suture in the GI tract.

Not Found

The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called "The US Endoscopy Endoscopic Suture Cutter Device." This type of document primarily confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices and is thus cleared for market.

Crucially, 510(k) notifications do not typically include detailed studies or acceptance criteria for device performance in the way that a PMA (Pre-Market Approval) or clinical trial report would. The 510(k) process focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence, often through bench testing, materials characterization, and comparisons to predicate devices, rather than extensive clinical efficacy studies with specific performance metrics and acceptance criteria.

Therefore, based solely on the provided text, it is not possible to provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them. The document does not contain:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
2. Sample sizes for test sets or data provenance.
3. Information on experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.
4. Adjudication methods.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study details or effect sizes.
6. Standalone algorithm performance (as this is a physical medical device, not an AI algorithm).
7. Type of ground truth used.
8. Sample size for the training set.
9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

The document states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices..." This indicates that the clearance was based on substantial equivalence, not on meeting specific, pre-defined performance acceptance criteria from a comprehensive study detailed in this document.

To find the kind of information requested, one would typically need to refer to the full 510(k) submission itself (which is often voluminous and not publicly released in its entirety), or any associated clinical trial publications if they were part of the submission (though for 510(k)s, clinical data is often not required or is limited).

In summary, the provided text does not contain the information needed to answer the prompt.

Ask a specific question about this device