Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(40 days)
EMT QUIK-COVER FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPE BARRIER SHEATH, SERIES 1-7
The EndoMedical Technologies Quik-Cover™ Flexible Endoscope Barrier Sheath provides a sterile, disposable protective covering for flexible endoscopes during endoscopic examination of bladder, urethra, lower gastrointestinal tract, and upper gastrointestinal structures including the esophagus.
The EndoMedical Technologies Quik-Cover Flexible Endoscope Barrier Sheath (EndoMedical Technologies Quilt-Cover™) is a sterile, single-use device that covers the entire patient contact surface of flexible endoscopes and eliminates the need for high-level disinfection of the endoscope following each procedure. The device is composed of a contiguous polymeric sheath, with an optical window at the distal end which is preloaded on a deployment tube. Some models of the EndoMedival Technologies Quik-Cover™ include a Y-connector and side port channel(s) that are intended to allow passage of air, water, suction and biopsy instruments.
The provided text describes a medical device, the EndoMedical Technologies Quik-Cover™ Flexible Endoscope Barrier Sheath, and its 510(k) summary for FDA clearance. However, the document does not contain the specific details required to fully address your request in the format you specified, particularly regarding detailed acceptance criteria, study methodologies, sample sizes for test and training sets, expert qualifications, or comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC).
The document states that "Nonclinical performance testing demonstrated that the EndoMedical Technologies Quik-Cover reliably achieves the desired affect and is safe for its intended use." This is a general statement of results, not a detailed breakdown of acceptance criteria and performance data.
Here's what can be extracted and what is missing based on your request:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Optical Qualities of Sheath Window | Not explicitly stated in terms of specific metrics or thresholds. The study mentions this as a nonclinical test performed. |
Sheath Mechanical Tests | Not explicitly stated in terms of specific metrics or thresholds (e.g., tensile strength, tear resistance, puncture resistance). The study mentions this as a nonclinical test performed. |
Finished Device Barrier Testing | Not explicitly stated in terms of specific metrics or thresholds (e.g., microbial barrier effectiveness, fluid impermeability). The study mentions this as a nonclinical test performed. |
Overall Safety and Effectiveness | "Nonclinical performance testing demonstrated that the EndoMedical Technologies Quik-Cover reliably achieves the desired affect and is safe for its intended use." |
"No new questions of safety or effectiveness for endoscope barrier sheaths were raised during the testing." |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified in the provided text.
- Data Provenance: Not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective). The tests are described as "nonclinical," suggesting laboratory testing rather than human clinical trials with patient data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- Number of Experts: Not applicable/not specified. The testing was nonclinical (laboratory-based) and focused on device performance characteristics rather than medical image interpretation or clinical diagnosis requiring expert ground truth.
- Qualifications of Experts: Not applicable/not specified.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Adjudication Method: Not applicable/not specified. Given the nonclinical nature of the tests, an adjudication method for expert consensus on ground truth would not be relevant.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- MRMC Study: No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The document focuses on the substantial equivalence of device properties (material, design, nonclinical performance) to predicate devices, not on the impact of the device on human reader performance.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
- Standalone Study: Yes, in a sense. The described "nonclinical tests" are standalone evaluations of the device's physical and functional properties (e.g., optical qualities, mechanical strength, barrier integrity) without human interaction during the test itself. This is not an "algorithm only" study as it's a physical device, but it represents standalone device performance.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Type of Ground Truth: For the nonclinical tests mentioned (optical qualities, mechanical tests, barrier testing), the "ground truth" would be objective physical and material standards, specifications, and test methods designed to measure these properties. For example, a barrier test might have a measurable standard for microbial penetration, or a mechanical test might have a specified breaking point.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not a machine learning model or algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- How Ground Truth Was Established: Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
Summary of Gaps:
The provided 510(k) summary is typical for a physical medical device seeking substantial equivalence. It focuses on demonstrating that the new device shares similar fundamental technology and performance characteristics with existing cleared devices. It does not contain the detailed clinical trial or AI model validation information you are requesting. For such a device, "acceptance criteria" are usually internal design specifications and performance standards against which the manufactured product is tested. The "study" proving it meets criteria refers to the nonclinical bench testing outlined, but the specific metrics and results are not detailed in this summary.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1