LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K984247
    Device Name
    ELIPAR TRILIGHT
    Manufacturer
    ESPE DENTAL AG
    Date Cleared
    1999-02-25

    (90 days)

    Product Code
    EBZ
    Regulation Number
    872.6070
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K803209
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ELIPAR TRILIGHT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Activator for light-induced intraoral polymerization of resinous dental pit and fissure sealants, restorative materials, bondings, or luting materials

    Device Description

    ELIPAR® TRILIGHT is classified as an Ultraviolet Activator for Polymerization (21 C.F.R. § 872.6070) because it is a device intended to polymerize (set) resinous dental pit and fissure sealants or restorative materials by transmission of light through a rod. (Light-Curing Unit).

    ELIPAR® TRILIGHT has the same intended use and is substantially equivalent to ESPE's already 510(k) cleared light-curing unit ELIPAR® (VISIO®). Actually, the ELIPAR® TRILIGHT light source is a further development of the ELIPAR® (VISIO®) light source to provide the patient and user with more comfortable handling and more favorable properties. The Euror® (Visio®) light source is well established and determined to be safe and effective.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the ELIPAR® TRILIGHT, a light-curing unit for dental polymerization. It states the device's intended use and claims substantial equivalence to a predicate device, ELIPAR® (VISIO®). However, the provided text does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, study designs (sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods), or any comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC or standalone).

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them because this information is not present in the provided document.

    The document primarily focuses on:

    • Contact information of the submitter.
    • Device name, classification, and common name.
    • Predicate device.
    • A general description of the device and its intended use, emphasizing its substantial equivalence to the predicate.
    • The FDA's letter of clearance, confirming substantial equivalence and outlining regulatory responsibilities.
    • Statement of indications for use.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1