Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K973540
    Date Cleared
    1997-12-17

    (90 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.5050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The EOS iCom/QuickMode Software Options, as with the predicate SLi Series system, is intended to be used for radiation therapy treatments of malignant neoplastic diseases, as determined by a licensed medical practitioner.

    Device Description

    The EOS iCom/QuickMode Software Options are improvements to the existing SLi Series Linear Accelerators which have previously been cleared for commercial distribution.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a summary of safety and effectiveness information for the Elekta Oncology Systems iCom/QuickMode Software Options, along with the FDA's 510(k) clearance letter and Indications for Use statement. This documentation does not contain details about specific acceptance criteria or an analytical study with performance metrics for the software options themselves. Instead, it focuses on the equivalence to a predicate device and compliance with regulatory standards.

    Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, or details about sample size, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or training data for the iCom/QuickMode Software Options based on the input.

    However, I can extract the information that is present regarding the device's regulatory pathway and safety/effectiveness claims:


    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Based on the provided documents, specific quantitative acceptance criteria or reported device performance metrics for the QuickMode Software Options are not present. The main claim for effectiveness and safety is based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device and adherence to quality systems and standards.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    SafetyEstablished and proven track record with existing SLi Series Linear Accelerators. No additional safety concerns introduced. Compliance with IEC 601-1, IEC 601-2-1, IEC 950, UL 1950, CE mark (European Medical Device Directive, Electromagnetic Compatibility Directive). Hazard analysis concluded no new safety or effectiveness considerations.
    EffectivenessFunctionally an "enhancement to the existing SLi Series Linear Accelerators." Substantially equivalent to predicate devices (SLi Series Linear Accelerators) cleared prior to May 28, 1976. Intended for radiation therapy treatments of malignant neoplastic diseases.
    QualityDeveloped using an established and documented Software Quality Management System (ISO 9001, EN 46001, Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC Annex II, US 21 CFR 820 GMP). Subject to internal and external Quality Audits (SGS Yarsley, FDA).

    Missing Information (Not available in the provided text):

    • 2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
    • 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
    • 4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
    • 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    • 6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
    • 7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
    • 8. The sample size for the training set
    • 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    The provided FDA clearance and accompanying summaries primarily demonstrate regulatory compliance and substantial equivalence to existing, already-cleared devices, rather than presenting a performance study of the software options against specific acceptance criteria. The "effectiveness information" refers to the device's intended use and the fact that it doesn't introduce new effectiveness concerns compared to the predicate device, which has an "established and proven track record for safety."

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1