Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K962783
    Device Name
    EDEMA SYSTEM
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-10-23

    (463 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2770
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Edema System is a device intended to provide information which the physician or health care professional can utilize for therapeutic and preventative instruction in treating edema of the extremities.
    The Edema System is a device intended to provide information which the physician or health care professional can utilize for therapeutic and preventative instruction in treating increased extremity edema.

    Device Description

    The Edema System is a device that measures body composition in terms of edema of the extremities. Specialized software monitors the impedance values taken from the patient along with additional biological data. The device is connected to the patient via non-invasive electrode sensors and placement leads. The device operates off of a 9-volt battery and is fully portable. The addition of an IBM compatible computer workstation is required to run the accompanying software program.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain a detailed description of acceptance criteria or a specific study proving the device meets those criteria, as typically outlined in present-day regulatory submissions. This submission dates back to 1997, and the level of detail regarding performance data in summary sections was often less extensive than what is expected today.

    However, based on the available information, here's what can be extracted and inferred:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria. It broadly claims "accuracy and repeatability" for the device's performance.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Performs as intendedDemonstrated to perform as intended
    AccuracyDemonstrated with accuracy
    RepeatabilityDemonstrated with repeatability

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    This information is not provided in the summary. The text indicates that "Complete results of performance testing of the Edema System have been included in Sections 14 and 17 of this submission," but these sections are not included in the provided excerpt. Therefore, the sample size for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) are unknown.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the summary. There is no mention of expert involvement in establishing ground truth for any test set.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided in the summary.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    There is no indication of an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers or AI assistance. The device mentioned is an "Edema System," which is an "Impedance Plethysmograph" used to measure body composition in terms of edema. It's an older technology and does not appear to involve AI in the way modern devices do for interpretation.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    The device itself is likely standalone in the sense that it provides measurements. However, the summary does not explicitly describe a standalone performance study in the context of an "algorithm only" as understood for AI/CAD devices. The software "monitors the impedance values...along with additional biological data," implying a processing algorithm, but no specific study of its isolated performance is detailed.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    This information is not explicitly stated in the summary. Given the nature of an "Impedance Plethysmograph," ground truth would likely involve direct physical measurements of edema or comparison with established clinical methods for assessing edema (e.g., volumetric measurements, weighted difference, or clinical assessment by a physician). However, the specific method is not mentioned.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not provided in the summary. The document mentions "Specialized software monitors the impedance values," suggesting an algorithm that might have been trained, but no details on training data or its size are included.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not provided in the summary.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1