Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K023190
    Date Cleared
    2002-10-24

    (29 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    E.CAM COMPUTER / E.SOFT WORKSTATION

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    E.CAM Computer / e.soft Workstation is a Gamma Camera computer for nuclear medicine used to detect or image the distribution of radionuclides in the body or organ, using the following techniques:

    • Planar Imaging
    • Whole body imaging
    • Tomographic imaging (SPECT) for non positron emitter
    • Positron imaging by coincidence
    • Positron imaging without coincidence up to 588 keV
    • Display and process nuclear medicine, PET and CT images
    Device Description

    E.CAM Computer / e.soft Workstation provides primary user interface for acquiring images from the Siemens E.CAM family of nuclear medicine Gamma cameras, as well as a collection of clinical applications for processing and review of images from any nuclear medicine and/or positron emission imaging systems. E.SOFT relies on standard networking and image transfer protocols (TCP/IP and DICOM) for connection to/from other devices, including NM, PET and CT imaging stations, image review/storage (PACS) stations, hardcopy devices, external archive devices and HIS/RIS (Hospital information/Radiological Information Systems).

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary for the E.CAM Computer/e.soft Workstation does not contain the detailed study information needed to fill out your request. It states that the device is being modified to include features like attenuation correction with CT images and improved reconstruction. However, it does not include:

    • Acceptance criteria or reported device performance metrics for these new features.
    • Details about a study conducted to prove the device meets specific performance criteria.
    • Information on sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone performance.

    The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices based on similar indicated use, operating principle, and basic product design, rather than presenting a performance study for the new modifications. It mentions a "risk analysis method used to assess the impact of the modifications was based on a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FEMA)," but this is a design control activity, not a performance study that generates the data you're asking for.

    Therefore, I cannot complete your request with the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1