Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K223778
    Date Cleared
    2023-03-31

    (105 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Diode Laser Hair Removal System (RD-SLD600)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Diode Laser Hair Removal System (RD-SLD600) is intended for hair removal, permanent hair reduction on all skin types (Fitzpatrick skin type I-VI), including tanned skin. Permanent hair reduction is defined as the long-term. stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing when measured at 6, 9, and 12 months after the completion of a treatment regime.

    Device Description

    The proposed device, Diode Laser Hair Removal System (RD-SLD600) is a professional platform, it is intended for the removal of unwanted hair and to effect stable, long-term hair reduction on all skin types (Fitzpatrick skin type I-VI). The complete system consists of its console, module and a footswitch. The module is pressed against the patient's skin and a light pulse is delivered when the emitted button or the footswitch are activated. The crystal contact surface is cooled by the RD-SLD600's cooling system. Output parameters and other system features are controlled from the touch-screen control panel on the console, which provides an interface to the system's microcontroller through and LCD touch-screen.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for a Diode Laser Hair Removal System (RD-SLD600). It asserts substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on non-clinical testing. Crucially, no clinical studies were performed for this device as part of the submission. Therefore, the document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria through clinical performance.

    The document states:

    • "Clinical testing was not performed for the subject device as part of the submission." (page 8)
    • The conclusion is based on non-clinical tests (Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility, and Biocompatibility) which determined the device to be "safe and effective for its intended use, and performs as well or better than the predicate devices" (page 8).

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria, as such a study was explicitly not conducted according to this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1