Search Results

The DiamondTOUCH Inflation Syringe is used to inflate and deflate balloon angioplasty catheters or other interventional devices and to measure the pressure and time of inflation within the balloon during the procedure. It is also used to dispense fluids into the body and monitor the pressure of that fluid.

The DiamondTOUCH™ Inflation Device and Fluid Dispensing Syringe by Merit Medical is a 30mL disposable device with an integral pressure transducer, microcomputer, back-lit LCD, threaded plunger assembly with lock/release bar, a flexible high pressure extension tube, and a three-way stopcock. The DiamondTOUCH™ is designed to generate positive and negative pressure, and monitor positive pressures over a range of -0.4 ATM/BAR to +35ATM/BAR (-6 PSI to 514 PSI).

The provided text describes acceptance criteria and testing for the DiamondTOUCH Inflation Device and Fluid Dispensing Syringe, but it does not specify performance metrics with numerical acceptance criteria and reported device performance in a table format. Instead, it lists various types of tests conducted.

Here's a breakdown of the information that can be extracted, and what is not available:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

This information is not explicitly provided in a table with specific numerical thresholds and corresponding results for the DiamondTOUCH device. The document generally states that "The system complies with..." or that tests "were conducted," implying that the device met the requirements of the standards, but does not give quantitative results or specific acceptance criteria values.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

This information is not explicitly provided. The document details types of tests performed (e.g., Biocompatibility Testing, Electrical Safety and EMC, Software V&V, Performance Testing like Vacuum Leak, Accuracy Test), but does not specify the number of units tested for each, nor the country of origin of the data or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

This information is not applicable as this device is a physical medical instrument (inflation syringe), not a diagnostic algorithm or AI system that requires expert interpretation to establish ground truth for performance evaluation in the context of diagnoses. The "ground truth" for this device would be its mechanical and electrical specifications and safety compliance.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

This is not applicable for the same reasons as point 3. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies involving subjective interpretation of data (e.g., imaging studies) where multiple experts might disagree on findings.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

This is not applicable as this device is a physical medical instrument, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

This is not applicable as this device is a physical medical instrument, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used:

The "ground truth" for this device is effectively established by:

• International Standards: The device was tested against recognized international standards such as AAMI ANSI ES 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 62366, IEC 60601-1-6, ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, and ISO 594-2. Compliance with these standards serves as the ground truth for safety, performance, and biocompatibility.
• Internal Specifications/Risk Analysis: Performance testing was conducted "based on the risk analysis and based on the requirements of the following international standards," indicating that internal specifications derived from these standards define the expected performance.
• Software Verification and Validation Testing: For the software component, the ground truth is established by design specifications and requirements, with "a 'major' level of concern, since a failure or latent flaw in the software could directly result in serious injury or death."

8. The sample size for the training set:

This is not applicable. This document describes a medical device, not a machine learning model, so there is no concept of a "training set" in the context of the described validation.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

This is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device