Search Results

The Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Vision 325Z DV 3-CCD Color Video Camera System is indicated for use in endoscopic surgical procedures to allow visualization of the articular cavities, body cavities, hollow organs and canals, when used with an appropriately indicated endoscope.

Additionally, when used in conjunction with a Dyonics® light source and light cable, the 325Z DV Camera System is indicated for use in endoscopic surgical procedures in the thoracic cavity when used with an appropriately indicated thoracoscope.

The Smith & Nephew Dyonics® Vision 325Z DV Hermes- Ready™3 CCD Camera is used in endoscopic surgical procedures to capture and transmit video images. The Hermes-Ready™ feature will enable voice and pendant control of white balance, zoom, shutter control, enhancement and on/off ability from a central location when used in conjunction with a Hermes™ Digital O.R. Control Center.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Dyonics® Vision 325Z DV 3-CCD Hermes-Ready™ Camera System. It outlines the device's description, intended use, technological characteristics, and comparison to a predicate device. However, the document does not contain the detailed performance data or study results typically used to establish acceptance criteria for a medical device's specific functional performance.

The "Summary Performance Data" section in the document (Section H) states: "All verification and validation data demonstrates that the device is safe and effective and performs as intended." This is a general statement and does not provide specific acceptance criteria or the study details requested.

Most of the requested information (sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details) is not present in this 510(k) summary because it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on intended use and technological characteristics, rather than reporting detailed performance studies against specific acceptance criteria for a new clinical claim. In 2003, for simple devices like a camera system, the FDA often relied on verification and validation testing demonstrating adherence to recognized standards and that the device operates as intended, without requiring extensive clinical performance studies that are common for AI/ML devices today.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance or the detailed study information using only the provided text.

Based on the available document, here's what can be inferred or stated about the device and its assessment:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

• Cannot be provided as the document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed performance metrics. The summary only states that "All verification and validation data demonstrates that the device is safe and effective and performs as intended."

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Not provided. The document does not describe a clinical test set or its characteristics.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• Not applicable/Not provided. No clinical test set or human-interpreted ground truth is mentioned in this 510(k) summary.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not applicable/Not provided. No clinical test set or adjudication process is mentioned.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• No. This device is a camera system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. An MRMC study would not be relevant for this type of product.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable/Not provided. This is a camera system, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Not applicable/Not provided. No clinical ground truth is mentioned. For a camera system, ground truth would typically relate to optical performance, resolution, color accuracy, and safety standards, which are assessed through engineering verification and validation, not clinical ground truth.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable/Not provided. This is a hardware camera system, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable/Not provided. As above, no training set for an algorithm is relevant here.

Summary of what the document does state regarding acceptance/verification:

• Standards for Verification: The device "will be tested with the following domestic and international standards:"
  • UL 2601-1: Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment, Part 1: General Requirements for Safety
  • EN 60601-1: Standard for Medical Electrical Equipment, Part 1: General Requirements for Safety + Amendments 1 and 2
  • EN 60601-1-1: Medical Electrical Equipment General Requirements for Safety 1. Collateral Standard: Safety Requirements for Medical Electrical Systems
  • EN 60601-1-2: Medical Electrical Equipment General Requirements for Safety 2. Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility- Requirements and Tests
  • CAN/CSA C22.2 No. 601.1-M90- Medical Electrical Equipment General Requirements for Safety: A National Standard for Canada
• General Performance Statement: "All verification and validation data demonstrates that the device is safe and effective and performs as intended."
• Substantial Equivalence: The primary "proof" for this 510(k) submission is the comparison to the predicate device (Smith & Nephew Images Digital 3-Chip Color Video Camera), demonstrating that the Dyonics® Vision 325Z DV Hermes-Ready™ 3-CCD Color Video Camera System has "the same technological characteristics and intended use." The Hermes-Ready™ feature is an "addition of communication interface for voice activation... without changing the intended use or features."

Ask a specific question about this device