Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(294 days)
DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft Plus
The DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft Plus is indicated for:
- Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge
- Filling of infrabony periodontal defects
- Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy
- Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge
- Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor
- Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
- Filling of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
The DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft Plus is a non-pyrogenic porous bone mineral and collagen matrix for use in periodontal, oral, and maxillofacial surgery. The DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft Plus is composed of anorganic porcine bone granules combined with bovine collagen to form small cylinders. The device is provided in sizes ranging from 100 - 500mg. DSM Dental Bone Graft Plus is supplied sterile by gamma irradiation and is for single use only.
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding the "DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft Plus." It concerns the substantial equivalence of this new device to a predicate device, not the results of a clinical study demonstrating the device's performance against predefined acceptance criteria for a new AI/software medical device.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information as the document does not contain:
- Acceptance criteria and reported device performance (table): The document discusses the equivalence of a bone graft material to a predicate, focusing on material properties, indications for use, and a demonstration in an animal model. It does not present quantitative performance against specific clinical acceptance criteria typically seen for AI/software medical devices (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC).
- Sample size and data provenance for a test set: The document mentions an "animal study" but does not detail the sample size (number of animals or cases in a test set), nor does it describe data provenance in terms of country of origin or retrospective/prospective nature, as would be relevant for clinical data in AI/software evaluation.
- Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth: This is relevant for AI/software devices whose ground truth is often established by expert consensus. This document pertains to a physical bone graft material, and the ground truth for an animal study would be based on histological or imaging analysis, not expert interpretation of outputs of an AI algorithm.
- Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for a physical medical device.
- Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: This is a study design specifically for evaluating the impact of AI assistance on human reader performance, which is not relevant for a bone graft material.
- Standalone (algorithm only) performance: This is for software, not a physical device.
- Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): While animal study results (likely histological or imaging evidence of bone formation) serve as ground truth for the performance of the bone graft, the nature of "ground truth" establishment for AI/software (e.g., expert reads, pathology reports) is not present.
- Sample size for the training set: This refers to AI/machine learning models, which are not discussed in this document.
- How ground truth for the training set was established: Also refers to AI/machine learning models.
The document primarily focuses on establishing "substantial equivalence" of the new bone graft material to an existing one, based on:
- Non-clinical testing data: Mechanical and physical testing, biocompatibility testing (ISO standards), and pyrogenicity testing.
- Animal Testing: A canine intrabony defect animal study comparing the new device to the predicate device to evaluate bone healing.
In essence, this document is a regulatory submission for a physical medical device, not a performance study report for an AI/software medical device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(110 days)
DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft
DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft is indicated for:
- Augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge
- Filling of infrabony periodontal defects
- Filling of defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy
- Filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge
- Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor
- Filling of periodontal defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
- Filling of peri-implant defects in conjunction with products intended for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
The DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft is a non-pyrogenic porous bone mineral matrix for use in periodontal, oral, and maxillofacial surgery. It is produced by removing organic components from porcine bone. The composition of DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft meets the requirements of ASTM F 1581 Standard Specification for Composition of Anorganic Bone for Surgical Implants. The device is provided as cancellous granules approximately 0.25 - 1.0mm in size. It is supplied sterile by gamma irradiation and is for single use only.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the DSM Biomedical Dental Bone Graft. It describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to a predicate device (Bio-OSS®). However, this document does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study proving that an AI device meets acceptance criteria.
Instead, it pertains to a traditional medical device (a dental bone graft material) and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through material characterization, bench testing, biocompatibility testing, viral inactivation, and an animal study.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving an AI device's performance based on the provided text. The document does not describe an AI device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1