Search Results

The Drystar 5500 is a free-standing printer used to print diagnostic images on transparent film for viewing on a standard view box. It may be used in any situation in which a hard copy of an image generated by a medical imaging device is required or desirable.

The Drystar 5500 is a dry-process, B/W printer, using the direct thermal printing principle to establish continuous-tone images with medical diagnostic image quality. The printer has two film input trays and each can accept any of five sizes of film, 8x10, 10x12, 11x14, 14x14, and 14x17. Film may be loaded in full daylight. The printer is a network-only printer. The resolution of both the Drystar 4500 and 5500 is 506 dpi. The print head in the Drystar 5500 is 14 inches wide (compared to 10 inches in the 4500), which with constant resolution means more pixels per line for the 5500. The film for the Drystar 5500, DT2 B/C, allows for faster printing (up to 180 films per minute for the largest size film) than the TM1 B/C used with the Drystar 4500.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Drystar 5500 medical image printer. It establishes substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Drystar 4500) and describes general characteristics and intended use. However, it does not contain specific acceptance criteria, performance data from a study, or details regarding ground truth establishment that would typically be found in a study report for a diagnostic device.

The document focuses on regulatory approval based on equivalence and safety/EMC standards. Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted from this text.

Here's a breakdown of what can and cannot be answered based on the provided document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

• Cannot be provided: The document states "The Drystar 5500 will be certified for electrical safety according to EN 60601-1-1 and UL-2601, and electromagnetic compatibility according to EN 60601-1-2." These are general safety and EMC standards, not performance acceptance criteria for image quality or diagnostic accuracy. No specific performance metrics (e.g., optical density range, spatial resolution, contrast ratio, throughput rates as "performance" related to image quality) or acceptance criteria (e.g., "must achieve X OD min/max") are detailed. The only performance mention is faster printing for the new film ("up to 180 films per minute for the largest size film"), but this is not framed as an acceptance criterion.

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Cannot be provided: The document refers to "TESTING" in the context of electrical safety and EMC certification, not a clinical or image quality performance test set involving medical images. Therefore, there's no mention of sample size or data provenance for such a test.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• Cannot be provided: As there's no diagnostic performance study described, there is no mention of experts or ground truth establishment.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Cannot be provided: No diagnostic performance study or test set is described.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Cannot be provided: This is a printer, not an AI diagnostic device. No MRMC study was performed or described.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• N/A: This is a printer. The concept of "standalone algorithm performance" doesn't apply. The device's function is to produce a hard copy from an existing medical image, not to perform diagnostic analysis itself.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Cannot be provided: Not applicable, as no diagnostic performance study is described. The device's "ground truth" relates to accurate reproduction of the input image, rather than a medical diagnosis.

8. The sample size for the training set

• N/A: As a printer, it doesn't utilize "training sets" in the context of machine learning or AI.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• N/A: Not applicable for the same reason as above.

Ask a specific question about this device