Search Results

Two-way Disposable Silicone Foley Catheter: Urethral catheterization for bladder drainage for urological use only; the indwell time of the proposed device is no more than 30 days.

Three-way Disposable Silicone Foley Catheter: Urethral catheterization for bladder drainage and bladder irrigation for urological use only; the indwell time of the proposed device is no more than 30 days.

The Disposable Silicone Foley Catheter is available in two types, two-way disposable silicone Foley catheter and three-way disposable silicone Foley catheter.

The two-way disposable silicone Foley catheter is composed of a double lumen tube, a double lumen hub, one balloon and a tip.

The three-way disposable silicone Foley catheter is composed of a triple lumen tube, a triple lumen hub, one balloon and a tip.

The proposed device is supplied in French size ranging from 6 to 26. It is available in 310mm and 400mm length with various balloon sizes. The devices are applied for male and female; the 6Fr, 8Fr and 10Fr catheters are for pediatric, and others are for adult.

The Disposable Silicone Foley Catheter is provided EO sterilized as a single used device.

The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for a Disposable Silicone Foley Catheter, which primarily relies on substantial equivalence to a predicate device and bench testing against recognized standards. It is not a study focused on AI or human-in-the-loop performance, so many of the requested categories are not applicable.

Here's an analysis based on the provided document:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Study Details:

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of clinical data for performance evaluation. The "tests" mentioned are non-clinical bench tests (e.g., mechanical, biocompatibility, sterilization) that compare the device's physical properties and performance against established international and ASTM standards. No patient data is involved. The data provenance is laboratory testing conducted by the manufacturer, Guangdong Baihe Medical Technology Co., Ltd., in China.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests is defined by the requirements of the recognized standards themselves (e.g., a specific flow rate value, a certain seal strength). No human experts were used to establish a "ground truth" for these engineering and biological performance metrics.

3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically for clinical studies involving human interpretation or subjective assessments. These were objective bench tests.

4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This submission is for a medical device (Foley Catheter), not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive technology.

5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This document pertains to a physical medical device.

6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests is represented by the specific performance thresholds and methodologies detailed within the referenced international and ASTM standards (e.g., ISO 11135-1, ASTM F623-99).

7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning study.

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device