Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K090742
    Date Cleared
    2009-09-18

    (182 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1680
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    DIGITAL FLAT PANEL X-RAY DETECTOR, MODEL LTX240AA01-A

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    LTX240AA01-A Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector is indicated for digital imaging solution designed for general radiographic system for human anatomy. It is intended to replace film or screen based radiographic systems to in all general purpose diagnostic procedures. Not to be used for mammography.

    Device Description

    LTX240AA01-A is a medical image processing unit. Especially, advanced digital imaging process allows considerably efficient diagnosis, all kind of information management, real-time sharing of image information on network. LTX240AA01-A is an X-Ray image acquisition device that is based on flat-panel. This device should be integrated with an operating PC and a X-Ray generator. It can do to utilize as digitalizing x-ray images and transfer for radiography diagnostic

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain any information about a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a Digital Flat Panel X-Ray Detector (LTX240AA01-A). It primarily focuses on:

    • Device identification and description.
    • Comparison to a predicate device (Canon CXDI-50G).
    • Safety, EMC, and performance testing against standards (EN/IEC 60601-1 and EN/IEC 60801-1-2(2001)). It states all test results were satisfactory but doesn't mention specific acceptance criteria or the results themselves.
    • Indications for Use.
    • A conclusion of substantial equivalence to the predicate device.

    It lacks details regarding:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes for a test set, data provenance.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for a test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study or its effect size.
    6. Standalone (algorithm only) performance study.
    7. Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data).
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

    The document indicates that electrical, mechanical, environmental safety, and performance testing was "performed" and "All test results were satisfactory," but it does not detail what these tests were, what the acceptance criteria for those tests were, or what the specific satisfactory results implied in terms of performance metrics.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for a table of acceptance criteria and the study details because that information is not present in the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1