Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K071746
    Date Cleared
    2007-12-13

    (169 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4460
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    DERMA PRENE PI OR ISOTOUCH GREEN STERILE POWDER-FREE SYNTHETIC POLYISOPRENE SURGICAL GLOVES

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    These gloves are intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect a surgical wound from contamination.

    Device Description

    Derma Prene® PI or Isotouch® Green Sterile Powder-Free Synthetic Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves meet all of the requirements of ASTM D 3577-06, Type 2.
    Derma Prene® PI or Isotouch® Green Sterile Powder-Free Synthetic Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves meet all of the current specifications of ASTM D 3577-06, Type 2.
    Derma Prene® PI or Isotouch® Green Sterile Powder-Free Synthetic Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves are sterile disposable devices intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect a surgical wound from contamination.
    Derma Prene® PI or Isotouch® Green Sterile Powder-Free Synthetic Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves are summarized with the following technological characteristics compared to ASTM or equivalent standards.
    Characteristics: Dimensions, Physical Properties, Freedom from Holes, Powder Free
    Standard: Meets ASTM D 3577, Meets ASTM D 3577, Type 2, Meets ASTM D 3577, Meets ASTM D 5151, Meets ASTM D 6124
    Powder content = 2 mg per glove

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria for the Ansell Derma Prene® PI or Isotouch® Green Sterile Powder-Free Synthetic Polyisoprene Surgical Gloves.

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    CharacteristicsAcceptance Criteria (Standard)Reported Device Performance
    DimensionsMeets ASTM D 3577Meets ASTM D 3577
    Physical PropertiesMeets ASTM D 3577, Type 2Meets ASTM D 3577, Type 2
    Freedom from HolesMeets ASTM D 3577 and ASTM D 5151Meets ASTM D 3577 and ASTM D 5151
    Powder FreeMeets ASTM D 6124Powder content = ≤ 2 mg per glove (Meeting ASTM D 6124)
    FHSA Skin Irritation StudyPassesPasses
    ISO Maximization Sensitization StudyPassesPasses
    Cytotoxicity Study using the End-Point Titration MethodNon-ToxicNon-Toxic at 24 hours

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for each test (e.g., freedom from holes, physical properties, biocompatibility). However, it indicates that the tests conform to established ASTM and ISO standards, which typically include defined sampling plans. The data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin or whether it was retrospective or prospective. It is implied to be laboratory testing conducted by the manufacturer or a certified lab to demonstrate compliance with the specified standards.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not applicable. The ground truth for this device is established through adherence to physical and performance standards (ASTM, ISO, FDA hole requirements) rather than expert consensus on interpretive data (like imaging studies).

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used for studies involving human interpretation (e.g., medical image analysis) to resolve discrepancies among experts. For this device, objective measurements against established standards determine compliance.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    An MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not applicable and not done. This device is a surgical glove, and its performance is evaluated based on physical properties, freedom from defects, and biocompatibility, not on human interpretive tasks or AI assistance.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    A standalone (algorithm-only) performance evaluation was not applicable and not done. This device is a physical product (surgical glove), not an algorithm or AI-driven system.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    The ground truth used for this device is based on established standard specifications and laboratory testing outcomes. This includes:

    • ASTM Standards: Defined dimensional, physical property, and hole specifications provided by ASTM D 3577 and ASTM D 5151.
    • ISO Standards: Biocompatibility testing protocols from ISO.
    • FDA Hole Requirements: Specific defect rate criteria mandated by the FDA.
    • Industry Standards: Powder content standards as specified by ASTM D 6124.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable. This device is a physical product, not a machine learning model, so there is no "training set."

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1