Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K981504
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-08-06

    (101 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.3100
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    DBEST AMPHETAMINES TEST KIT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    dBest Amphetamines Test Kit is a simple one step immunochromatographic assay for rapid, qualitative detection of amphetamines in urine with cutoff of 1000 ng/ml. The dBest Amphetamines Test Kits are for professional and laboratory use only.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the "dBest AMP Test Kit" and related documents. It does not contain the detailed information necessary to answer all the questions about acceptance criteria or a specific study proving the device meets them. This type of regulatory document typically confirms equivalence to a predicate device based on submitted data, rather than detailing the full study methodology and results.

    However, based on the limited information present in the document, here's what can be extracted:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria or a detailed performance table. The "Indications For Use" section provides a key performance characteristic:

    CharacteristicAcceptance Criterion (Implicit)Reported Performance (Implicit)
    Amphetamines detection cutoff in urineN/A (Not explicitly stated as a criterion)1000 ng/ml

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    This information is not available in the provided text. The document is a clearance letter, not the study report itself.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not available in the provided text.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not available in the provided text.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This device is an "immunochromatographic assay" – a rapid test kit for detecting amphetamines. It is not an AI-powered diagnostic device, nor does it involve "human readers" in the sense of interpreting complex images. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not applicable to this device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This refers to AI algorithm performance. As established above, this is not an AI device. The device itself is standalone in that it provides a direct result (qualitative detection of amphetamines).

    7. The type of ground truth used

    While not explicitly stated for the testing proving the device performance, for a diagnostic test like this, the ground truth would typically be established by a reference method, such as:

    • Mass Spectrometry (e.g., GC-MS or LC-MS): This is the gold standard for confirming drug presence and concentration in urine samples.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not available in the provided text, as it doesn't describe the study details. Furthermore, for a simple immunochromatographic assay, the concept of a "training set" (as typically used in machine learning) might not directly apply in the same way. Development would involve extensive analytical validation, but not necessarily machine learning training.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not available in the provided text. (See point 8 regarding "training set.")

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1