Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(190 days)
DART-FIRE EDGE Cannulated Screw System
The DART-FIRE EDGE Cannulated Screws are indicated for use in bone reconstruction, osteotomy, arthrodesis, joint fusion, fracture repair, and fracture fixation of foot and ankle bones appropriate for the device. Screws gre intended for single use only.
The DART-FIRE EDGE Cannulated Screw System contains partially and fully threaded, cannulated screws offered in a variety of diameters and lengths. The screws are manufactured from titanium alloy (ASTM F136).
Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criterion (Type of Test) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Insertion Torque | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Removal Torque | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Pull Out Strength | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Ultimate Torque | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Yield Torque Strength (per ASTM F543) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
RF Heating (per ASTM F2182 for MR Safety) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Image Artifact (per ASTM F2182 for MR Safety) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Induced Force (per ASTM F2052 for MR Safety) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
Induced Torques (per ASTM F2052 for MR Safety) | Demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate device |
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance
Not applicable. The study was non-clinical and involved performance testing of the device itself rather than a test set of data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications
Not applicable. This was a non-clinical study based on engineering performance tests.
4. Adjudication Method for Test Set
Not applicable. There was no test set requiring expert adjudication.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
Not applicable. This was a non-clinical study for a bone fixation device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance
Not applicable. This device is a physical medical implant, not an algorithm. The performance described is for the device's physical properties.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth or benchmark for performance was the performance of the legally marketed predicate device (K082320: Wright Compression Screws, K080850: DARCO Headless Compression Screw, K183696: PERFORM Reverse). The study aimed to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to these devices through various mechanical and MR Safety tests.
8. Sample Size for Training Set
Not applicable. This was a non-clinical study for a physical device, not an AI model.
9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. There was no training set in the context of this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1