Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K181549
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2018-08-03

    (52 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3060
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Curiteva Midline Anterior Cervical Plate System (or Curiteva Anterior Cervical Plate System)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Curiteva Midline Anterior Cervical Plate System is intended for anterior fixation of the cervical spine (C2-T1) as an adjunct to fusion. The system is intended to provide temporary stabilization during the development of cervical spinal fusion in patients with the following: degenerative disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, deformity (e.g., kyphosis, scoliosis), tumors, pseudarthrosis, and/or failed previous fusion.

    Device Description

    The Curiteva Midline Anterior Cervical Plate System consists of screws and plates. These implants are available in different sizes so that adaptations can be made to take into account pathology and individual patient anatomy. All implants are manufactured from Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) that conforms to ASTM F136 and are provided non-sterile.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Curiteva Midline Anterior Cervical Plate System. It describes the device, its intended use, and claims substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on non-clinical performance data. However, it does not contain the specific information requested in the prompt regarding acceptance criteria, particular performance metrics, details of a study that proves the device meets those criteria, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, or details about comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC or standalone AI performance).

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request as the essential information is not present in the provided document.

    A 510(k) submission primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, often through mechanical testing for implantable devices like the one described. It typically does not involve clinical studies with human readers or AI algorithms in the way the prompt's questions suggest.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1