Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K231494
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2023-10-27

    (157 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.4560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CoreLink Robotic Navigation Instruments

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    CoreLink Robotic Navigation Instruments are indicated to be used during the preparation screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures in either open or minimally invasive procedures for skeletally mature patients, where reference to a rigid anatomical structure such as vertebra can be identified. These instruments are designed for use with the Globus ExcelsiusGPS system, which is indicated for use as an aid for precisely locating anatomical structures and for the spatial positioning and orientation of an instrument holder or guide tube to be used by surgeons for navigating and/or guiding compatible surgical instruments in open or percutaneous procedures provided that the required fiducial markers and rigid patient anatomy can be identified on CT scans or fluoroscopy. The system is indicated for the placement of spinal and orthopedic bone screws.

    Device Description

    CoreLink Robotic Navigation Instruments are non-sterile, reusable instruments including taps and drivers that can be operated manually. These instruments are intended to be used with the Globus Medical Excelsius GPS® Robotic Navigation Platform to aid in implantation of CoreLink Pedicle Screw System implants (NextGen Pedicle Screw System, CoreLink Midline Fixation System (CentraFix), and Tiger Spine System). The instruments are manufactured from stainless steel.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the CoreLink Robotic Navigation Instruments. This type of submission is for medical devices that are substantially equivalent to a predicate device already on the market. As such, the focus of the submission is primarily on demonstrating this substantial equivalence through engineering analysis and comparison to existing cleared devices, rather than on extensive clinical performance data or a standalone performance study as would be seen for novel AI/ML-enabled devices.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria, a specific study proving device performance (beyond engineering analysis for equivalence), sample sizes, expert ground truth establishment, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance.

    The document states:

    • "The CoreLink Robotic Navigation Instruments have been evaluated through an engineering analysis and geometric comparison to predicate devices to establish the safety and efficacy for accuracy performance."
    • "The results of this engineering analysis show that the subject is substantially equivalent to the cleared predicate."

    This means the device's acceptable performance is demonstrated by its similarity to already cleared devices, and it's not being assessed as a novel AI/ML device requiring the robust performance study details typical for such submissions.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1