Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K032462
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-02-10

    (183 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    N/A
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CURAD® Silver Gel Bandage is indicated for first aid to help in minor abrasions, cuts, lacerations, scrapes, and scalds.

    Device Description

    The CURAD® Silver Active Gel Bandage is a polyurethane occlusive bandage that includes silver oxide in the polyurethane matrix. The polyurethane provides a moist healing environment. At the same time, silver ions reduce bacterial growth in the wound pad.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the 510(k) submission for the CURAD® Silver Active Gel Bandage. Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study conducted based on the given information:

    Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Silver ReleaseAcceptable Results
    Antimicrobial EffectAcceptable Results
    BiocompatibilitySatisfactory Results

    Note: The document states that the CURAD® Silver Active Gel Bandage was tested for "silver release and antimicrobial effect and was demonstrated to have acceptable results." Additionally, a "biocompatibility assessment was performed... with satisfactory results." Specific quantitative thresholds for "acceptable" and "satisfactory" are not provided in the summary.

    Study Details

    1. Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:
      The document does not specify the sample size used for the performance tests (silver release, antimicrobial effect, and biocompatibility). It also does not mention the data provenance in terms of country of origin or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective.

    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
      This information is not applicable and not provided in the context of the performance testing for a wound dressing. Performance tests for silver release, antimicrobial effect, and biocompatibility typically involve laboratory assays and standardized protocols, not expert interpretation of diagnostic images or clinical data.

    3. Adjudication method for the test set:
      Not applicable (see point 2).

    4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
      Not applicable. This device is a wound dressing, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring human reader studies.

    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
      Not applicable. This is not an algorithm-based device. The performance testing was for the intrinsic properties of the wound dressing.

    6. The type of ground truth used:
      The "ground truth" for this type of device would be established through laboratory measurements and standardized testing protocols for silver release, antimicrobial efficacy, and biocompatibility, as per relevant ISO standards or FDA guidance for wound dressings. The summary does not provide specific details on these protocols but states that results were "acceptable" and "satisfactory."

    7. The sample size for the training set:
      Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML product developed with a training set.

    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
      Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML product developed with a training set.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1