Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K984161
    Device Name
    CTS-310(B)
    Date Cleared
    1999-05-05

    (166 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CTS-310(B)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging and measurement for fetal imaging and other abdominal as well as pediatric, small organ, neonatal cephalic, adult cephalic, and heart.

    Device Description

    Model CTS-310B is a linear/convex electronic scanning ultrasonotomograph with a built-in digital scan converter (DSC). The unit allows heart, abdominal organic and fetal tomographic images to be observable on a video monitor. The main unit is portable and is separable from other equipment to be carried for its use at another place as well as being usable in combination with a 9-inch video monitor and a special photographic unit.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the SIUI CTS-310B Ultrasound Imaging System, structured according to your request.

    Please Note: The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification Summary from 1999. In this type of submission, the primary goal is to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than to prove safety and effectiveness through extensive, de novo clinical trials. Therefore, the information typically available for newer AI/SaMD devices (e.g., detailed study designs, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, MRMC studies, standalone performance metrics like AUC, sensitivity, specificity, etc.) is generally not present. The "acceptance criteria" here are mainly a demonstration that the new device's technical specifications match or are similar to the predicate device.


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for SIUI CTS-310B Ultrasound Imaging System

    The acceptance criteria for the SIUI CTS-310B Ultrasound Imaging System and its associated transducers (EZU-PL12 and EZU-PC3A) are based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the Hitachi Medical Corporation EUB-310 (K862867). The "study" proving this equivalence is a direct technical comparison.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by the specifications of the predicate device (Hitachi EUB-310A). The SIUI CTS-310B is deemed to meet these criteria by demonstrating identical or comparable performance across various technical characteristics.

    FeatureAcceptance Criteria (Predicate: Hitachi EUB-310A)Reported Device Performance (SIUI CTS-310B)Meets Criteria?
    Main Unit
    Scanning ModeElectronic linear scanning (compatible 80 elements linear probe); Electronic convex sector (compatible convex probe of 80 elements)Electronic linear scanning (compatible 80 elements linear probe); Electronic convex sector (compatible convex probe of 80 elements)Yes
    Display ModeB mode, B/B mode, M mode, B/M mode simultaneouslyB mode, B/B ode, M mode, B/M mode simultaneouslyYes
    MeasurementIn B mode: distance, area, circumference; In M mode: time interval, velocity, depth, heart rateIn B mode: distance, area, circumference; In M mode: time interval, velocity, depth, heart rateYes
    CalculationArea, circumference, volume, heart rate, pregnant weeks, heart functionArea, circumference, volume, heart rate, pregnant weeks, heart functionYes
    Focusing Mode4-steps dynamic focusing with variable aperture and lens focusing4-steps dynamic focusing with variable aperture and lens focusingYes
    Scanning Width (3.5MHz probe)Linear: 104mm (3.5MHz probe)Linear: 104mm (3.5MHz probe)Yes
    Scanning Width (5MHz probe)Linear: 61mm (5MHz probe)Linear: 61mm (5MHz probe)Yes
    Scanning Angle (Convex Sector)60° (convex sector scanning probe)60° (convex sector scanning probe)Yes
    Transmitting VoltagePulse height 130VPulse height 130VYes
    Transmitting Pulse Width (3.5MHz)140 μs (3.5MHz)140 μs (3.5MHz)Yes
    Transmitting Pulse Width (5MHz)100 μs (5MHz)100 μs (5MHz)Yes
    Detecting Depth (3.5MHz)Maximum depth: 210mm (3.5MHz probe)Maximum depth: 210mm (3.5MHz probe)Yes
    Detecting Depth (5MHz)Maximum depth: 140mm (5MHz probe)Maximum depth: 140mm (5MHz probe)Yes
    Zoom (3.5MHz)x1.0, x1.2, x1.5, x2.0 selectable + depth shiftx1.0, x1.2, x1.5, x2.0 selectable + depth shiftYes
    Zoom (5MHz)x1.0, x1.5, x2.0 selectable + depth shiftx1.0, x1.5, x2.0 selectable + depth shiftYes
    Frame RateMaximum 40 frame/secondMaximum 40 frame/secondYes
    Grey Scale1616Yes
    Memory512 x 512 x 4 bit512 x 512 x 4 bitYes
    Coordinate transformationMonitor can display electronic linear scanning image or convex sector scanning imageMonitor can display electronic linear scanning image or convex sector scanning imageYes
    Video OutputPAL or NTSC system TV signalPAL or NTSC system TV signalYes
    Power Supply100V, 110V, 117V, 200V, 220V or 234V, ±10%, 50/60Hz, about 250W100V, 110V, 117V, 200V, 220V or 234V, ±10%, 50/60Hz, about 250WYes
    Monitor5.5" and 9" black and white monitor9" black and white monitor (Note: SIUI only mentions 9", Hitachi offers both 5.5" and 9". This is not a deviation that would affect substantial equivalence in operation.)Comparable
    Volume and Weight405(W) X 710(1) X 1310(h)mm, approx. 40kg395 (W) x 1180 (H) x 728 (L)mm, approx. 65 kg (Note: Physical dimensions and weight differ, but this is not typically a performance-based acceptance criterion for image quality or safety for substantial equivalence.)Comparable
    Cursor ShiftBy joystick on keyboardBy trackball on keyboard (Note: Different interface, but achieves same function. Not a performance or safety issue.)Comparable
    Electrical Safety StandardConform to requirement of I class B type apparatus of IEC 601-1; Isolate resistor testing: 1000V L-L, L-G ≥ 10MΩ; Leakage current: U*-G≤500μA, P-G≤100μA; Voltage resistance testing: L-G, P-G 1500V 2mA, no sparking or arcing in 1 minute; Work normally when voltage changes ± 10%Conform to requirement of I class B type apparatus of IEC 601-1 isolate resistor testing: 1000V L-L, L-G ≥ 10MΩ; Leakage current: U*-G≤500μA, P-G≤100μA; Voltage resistance testing: L-G, P-G 1500V 2mA, no sparking or arcing in 1 minute; Work normally when voltage changes ± 10%Yes
    Probe Ultrasound
    EZU-PL12 (Transmitting Freq)5MHz (Hitachi EZU-PL12)5MHz (SIUI EZU-PL12)Yes
    EZU-PL12 (Scanning Width)61mm (Hitachi EZU-PL12)61mm (SIUI EZU-PL12)Yes
    EZU-PC3A (Transmitting Freq)3.5MHz (Hitachi EZU-PC3A)3.5MHz (SIUI EZU-PC3A)Yes
    EZU-PC3A (Scanning Angle)60° (Hitachi EZU-PC3A)60° (SIUI EZU-PC3A)Yes
    Operation EnvironmentTemperature 5-40°C, relative humidity 30-85% (no water drop)Temperature 5-40°C, relative humidity 30-85% (no water drop)Yes
    Storage EnvironmentTemperature -10-60°C, relative humidity 30-95% (no water drip) air pressure 700-1060mBTemperature -10-60°C, relative humidity 30-95% (no water drop) air pressure 700-1060mBYes

    2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: This submission does not describe a clinical test set in the way a modern AI/SaMD submission would. The "test" for substantial equivalence is primarily a technical comparison of specifications and intended use against a legally marketed predicate device. No patient data or image datasets are mentioned as being used for testing.
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable, as no clinical test set data is described. The comparison is based on the published technical specifications of the predicate device (Hitachi EUB-310A) and the manufacturer's own specifications for the SIUI CTS-310B, along with a demonstration of compliance with relevant electrical safety standards (IEC 601-1).

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    • Not applicable. No "ground truth" establishment using experts or patient data for a test set is described in this 510(k) submission. Substantial equivalence relies on comparing technical specifications and intended use.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Not applicable. No clinical test set requiring adjudication is described.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    • No. This is a 1999 510(k) for a conventional ultrasound system, not an AI/SaMD. Such studies are not part of the substantial equivalence pathway for this type of device.

    6. Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) Study

    • Not applicable. This device is a diagnostic ultrasound system operated by a human, not an algorithm providing standalone interpretations.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    • Not applicable in the context of an AI/SaMD. For this ultrasound system, the "ground truth" for demonstrating substantial equivalence is the set of established technical specifications and performance characteristics of the predicate device. The SIUI CTS-310B's own technical specifications were compared against these.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/SaMD. No machine learning training set is involved.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not applicable, as no training set is described.

    Summary of the "Study" for Substantial Equivalence:

    The "study" conducted for the SIUI CTS-310B Ultrasound Imaging System to meet acceptance criteria was a technical comparison against a predicate device, the Hitachi EUB-310A. The manufacturer presented detailed technical specifications for their device and demonstrated that these specifications were either identical or acceptably comparable to those of the predicate. This comparison supported the claim that the new device has the same fundamental scientific technology, materials, design, safety features, and performance characteristics, and the same intended use as the predicate device, thus establishing "substantial equivalence" as required for 510(k) clearance by the FDA. The "acceptance criteria" were met by showing that the proposed device performed within the operational and technical parameters established by the predicate. Regulatory compliance for electrical safety (IEC 601-1) was also a critical component.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1