Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K072518
    Date Cleared
    2007-12-20

    (104 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5970
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CRS Fibrin Analysis Catheter Testing System (FACTS) is intended to collect and remove obstructing material from the internal lumen surface of an indwelling central venous catheter to restore or improve catheter flow rate, and to provide a biofilm or fibrin sample which is suitable for microbiological analysis.

    Device Description

    The CRS Fibrin Analysis Catheter Testing System (FACTS) is an accessory to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). Each single use FACTS kit contains complete instructions for use, 2 pr nitrile powder free gloves (med), 2 each ear loop procedure face masks, 3 each alcohol swabs, 1 each BD Lure-Loc Access Device, 2 each vacutainer tube, 1 each test brush in sheath, 1 each over wrap drape, 1 each measure tape, 1 each clamp and 1 cach specimen transport bag. The testing brush consists of nylon bristles wound onto a flexible stainless steel wire. The testing brush is enclosed within a polysheath that is heat sealed at the distal end and again at the brush handle and is attached by color coded rings. The different rings indicate the diameter of the testing brush bristles.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (CRS Fibrin Analysis Catheter Testing System (FACTS)) but it does not contain details about specific acceptance criteria or a study proving that the device meets those criteria with numerical performance metrics.

    The document states:

    • "The results of bench and clinical testing indicates that the new device is as safe and effective as the predicate devices." (Page 1)

    However, it does not provide any data, acceptance criteria, or study specifics such as:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    • Sample sizes for test sets, data provenance.
    • Number/qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    • Adjudication methods.
    • MRMC comparative effectiveness study results (effect size).
    • Standalone algorithm performance.
    • Type of ground truth used.
    • Sample size for training set or how its ground truth was established.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them based on the provided input. The document is primarily focused on the device's identification, indications for use, description, and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices for regulatory clearance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1