Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K962362
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-08-08

    (50 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CORDIS ENVOY & VISTA BRITE TIP GUIDING CATHETERS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Vista Brite Tip: The guiding catheter is intended for use for intravascular introduction of interventional/diagnostic devices into the coronary and peripheral vascular systems. ENVOY: The ENVOY Guiding Catheter is intended for use in the peripheral, coronary and neurovasculature for the intravascular introduction of interventional/diagnostic devices.

    Device Description

    The ENVOY and Vista Brite Tip Guiding Catheters are single lumen catheters which features a nylon body reinforced with a tightly wound stainless braid wire. The braid wire extends from the hub into the Brite Tip segment. The transition segments of the catheters are designed with nylons of different durometers (stiffness) to provide a gradual decrease in material stiffness from the catheter body to the tip. The Brite Tip segment, located at the catheters' tip, is pellethane with a radiopaque filler, this is the softest material in the catheter.

    AI/ML Overview

    This looks like a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (Cordis Guiding Catheters) and not a study describing a device that uses AI or machine learning. Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert involvement, and ground truth establishment, which are typical for AI/ML performance evaluations, are not present in the provided text.

    The provided text focuses on:

    • General Provisions: Common and proprietary names, predicate devices, classification, and lack of established performance standards.
    • Indication For Use and Device Description: Explaining what the catheters are used for and their physical characteristics.
    • Biocompatibility: Stating that tests were successfully completed.
    • Summary of Substantial Equivalence: Claiming similarity to existing devices.
    • Proposed Labeling: Discussing package labels, instructions for use, and intended use statements.

    Conclusion:

    Based on the provided document, I cannot extract the information required to populate the table and answer the questions about acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance in the context of AI/ML. This document pertains to a traditional medical device submission (catheters) where performance is likely demonstrated through substantial equivalence to predicate devices and adherence to manufacturing and materials standards, rather than through complex performance metrics against a defined ground truth as would be the case for an AI algorithm.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1