Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K062210
    Date Cleared
    2006-09-25

    (55 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    COOL TOUCH, MODELS CT3S, CTEV, NS160, CTEV, LC160

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CoolTouch LC160 CTEV Nd:YAG Laser System with the JouleTraker accessory is indicated for the treatment of reflux of great and small saphenous veins associated with varicose veins and varicosities.

    Device Description

    The CoolTouch Nd:YAG Laser Systems are Nd:YAG lasers producing laser emission at 1320 nm. The lasers consist of a cabinet, which houses the power supply, cooling system, microcontroller and the laser, and the fiber optic. Accessories include a footswitch and a fiber optic pull-back device, the JouleTraker.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is for a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a laser system and explicitly states that no clinical performance data was submitted. Therefore, the device has not been "proven to meet acceptance criteria" through a study in this submission.

    Based on the information provided in K062210:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    Since "No clinical performance data was submitted," there is no table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance to present. The submission relies solely on substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted. This device is a laser system, not an AI diagnostic tool involving human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted. This device is a laser system.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted.

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted. This device is a laser system, not an AI model requiring a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    Not applicable. No clinical performance data was submitted.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1