Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K983609
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-12-16

    (63 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.6120
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The COOK Test Tube Heater is intended to be used to maintain the temperature of egg (oocyte) collection tubes at or near body temperature. The unit is designed to accept up to six Falcon® 2001 Series 10 mL test tubes.

    Device Description

    The COOK Test Tube Heater is an electronically controlled heating unit that holds collection test tubes and their contents during oocyte recovery. The unit is designed to accept up to six Falcon® 2001 Series 10 mL test tubes.

    AI/ML Overview

    Due to the nature of the device being a test tube heater and the provided documents focusing on its regulatory approval rather than clinical studies, much of the requested information (especially points 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 related to human subject studies or complex AI algorithms) is not applicable. The documentation primarily describes substantial equivalence to a predicate device and basic performance testing.

    Here's the breakdown of the available information:


    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Maintain the temperature of egg (oocyte) collection tubes at or near body temperature."The COOK Test Tube Heater was subjected to testing to assure satisfactory operating performance. The COOK Test Tube Heater passed the requirements of all tests." (Specific temperature ranges or tolerances are not provided in the submitted documents.)

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    Not applicable. The provided document describes technical performance testing of a device (a test tube heater), not a study involving human subjects, images, or biological samples with associated data provenance.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    Not applicable. Ground truth, in the context of expert review, is not relevant for a test tube heater's performance evaluation as described. Performance is measured against engineering specifications.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    Not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies involving subjective interpretations (e.g., image analysis by multiple readers) to resolve discrepancies. This is not relevant for a device like a test tube heater.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This device is a hardware component; it does not involve algorithms or AI.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    For the performance of the test tube heater, the "ground truth" would be established engineering specifications and measurement standards (e.g., calibrated thermometers). The document states the device "passed the requirements of all tests," indicating it met these pre-defined technical specifications.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. This device does not use machine learning or AI algorithms that require a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1